Modular Nuclear Power, why it matters and why now! A 10 minute brief!

---

Modular Nuclear Investments — 10-Minute Investor Brief

Strategic Context

Modular nuclear power — including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), advanced modular reactors, and micro-reactors — is emerging as a long-cycle industrial investment theme at the intersection of:

• grid reliability and baseload electrification,

• AI datacenter power requirements,

• industrial decarbonization & heat supply,

• reshoring of strategic infrastructure and energy security.

Unlike prior nuclear development cycles, current interest is driven less by ideology and more by:

• constrained power supply,

• system-level reliability gaps,

• the limits of intermittent generation in heavy industry,

• sovereign desire for secure domestic energy.

However —

Modular nuclear is not yet a mass-deployment investment story.

The investable opportunity today is primarily in:

1. fuel and fuel-services economics,

2. standardized manufacturing and component supply, and

3. engineering & deployment execution.

Pure-play SMR developers remain high-risk, binary-outcome ventures until first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors are financed, built, and proven repeatable.

Smart investors focus on execution signals, manufacturability, and capital discipline — not press releases or political enthusiasm.

---

What Modular Nuclear is Trying to Solve

Traditional gigawatt-scale reactors have historically faced:

• bespoke engineering,

• decade-long timelines,

• cost overruns,

• financing fragility.

Modular nuclear seeks to industrialize nuclear delivery by shifting value creation from field construction to factory manufacturing:

Traditional Megaproject	Modular Nuclear Objective
One-off custom builds	Repeatable, standardized units
On-site fabrication	Factory-built modules
Long unpredictable timelines	Shorter & controlled schedules
Cost escalation risk	Cost reductions via replication

The investment thesis becomes viable only if:

1. modules can be produced like industrial equipment, and

2. developers can demonstrate FOAK delivery without destroying capital.

Until those conditions mature, investors should expect measured, not explosive adoption.

---

Investor Evaluation Framework

To separate credible progress from narrative momentum, use three discipline filters.

---

Filter 1 — Execution Over Storytelling

Promising signals include:

• credible regulatory milestones,

• funded FOAK projects,

• sovereign, utility, or industrial customers,

• EPC and supply-chain integration,

• structured risk-sharing finance.

Weak signals include:

• roadmaps without capital backing,

• frequent timeline “resets,”

• dependency on fuel chains that don’t yet exist,

• value propositions that move faster than engineering reality.

Execution must be visible in:

• contracts,

• facilities,

• construction milestones,

—not conference stages.

---

Filter 2 — Standardization & Manufacturability

The core question:

Will these reactors become products, or remain projects?

Investors should favor programs showing:

• serial production intent,

• module yard or fabrication capability,

• standardized component qualification,

• concrete plans for replication, not prototypes.

Economic returns improve only when:

unit #5 is cheaper than unit #1

Manufacturing learning curves — not technological novelty — drive scalability.

---

Filter 3 — Capital Discipline

Nuclear history is full of capital destroyed by premature scale-up.

Sustainable programs:

• raise capital in stages,

• match hiring and scope to milestones,

• prioritize grants & strategic capital,

• avoid speculative business pivots.

Red flags:

• dilution cycles with weak execution,

• rapid headcount expansion ahead of financing,

• reliance on hype-driven narratives.

In modular nuclear:

The best companies move slow — on purpose.

---

Where Investors Are Most Likely to See Returns First

Returns are not evenly distributed across the value chain.

The most investable segments — today — are:

Priority	Segment	Why It Matters
1	Fuel cycle & uranium services	Required regardless of reactor design outcomes
2	Manufacturing & large nuclear components	Benefit from multiple programs in parallel
3	Engineering / EPC deployment	Paid early in planning & site development
4	SMR platform developers	High-risk upside only after FOAK success

The ecosystem earns revenue before SMRs scale.

Developers earn revenue only if SMRs scale.

---

Representative Public Companies by Risk Tier

(Examples — not recommendations.)

---

Lower Technology & Execution Risk — Core Exposure

Cameco (CCJ / CCO)
Uranium supply, conversion, and fuel services. Revenue visibility is driven by long-term contracting cycles and enrichment margins — not SMR timing.

BWX Technologies (BWXT)

Manufactures nuclear components and systems used across defense, commercial nuclear, and emerging SMR programs. Benefits from hardware and manufacturing standardization, not reactor design risk.

---

Moderate Risk — Industrial SMR Upside

Rolls-Royce (RR. / RYCEY)
Government-aligned UK SMR initiative with defined program structure, while core aerospace & defense segments provide cash-flow ballast.

Fluor (FLR)
Engineering and EPC execution revenue tied to early-works, planning, and program delivery across nuclear and industrial infrastructure.

---

High Risk — Venture-Style Optionality

NuScale (SMR)
Pure-play SMR developer. Upside depends on:

• FOAK financing,

• EPC execution,

• credible cost outcomes,

• manufacturing repeatability.

This is speculative by nature and should remain a small satellite position until replication evidence emerges.

---

What the Deployment Timeline Realistically Looks Like

Near-Term (0–5 Years)

Revenue concentrated in:

• fuel services,

• manufacturing orders,

• early EPC program work,

• life-extension and refurbishment of existing reactors.

Mid-Term (5–10 Years)

First modular deployments likely to appear in:

• remote / industrial power,

• military and micro-grid environments,

• early coal-replacement pilots,

• selective export demonstration projects.

Deployment will be measured and risk-managed.

Long-Term (>10 Years)

Strategic optionality:

• fleet replication,

• process-heat and hydrogen integration,

• large-scale baseload replacement,

• possible AI-adjacent energy hubs.

Treat these as potential upside, not base-case assumptions.

---

Major Catalyst Themes (2026–2030)

Confidence in the sector improves when:

• utilities sign long-term fuel contracts,

• HALEU & enriched fuel supply chains mature,

• standardized SMR regulatory pathways advance,

• manufacturing or module yard capacity is built,

• sovereign or export-financing frameworks materialize,

• EPC programs shift toward multi-site contract structures.

The most meaningful catalysts are those that shift progress:

from paper → to capital → to hardware → to replication.

Announcements without capital or construction do not materially change risk.

---

Portfolio Construction Philosophy

A disciplined modular-nuclear allocation emphasizes:

1. Fuel & manufacturing as the foundation

2. EPC & industrial partners as deployment leverage

3. Developers as controlled speculative exposure

Directional example mindsets:

Conservative approach

• Overweight Cameco + BWXT

• Moderate Rolls-Royce / Fluor

• Small NuScale satellite position

Aggressive approach

• Increase Rolls-Royce exposure

• Retain core anchors

• Allow slightly higher but still constrained developer allocation

In all cases:

SMR developers should not become core holdings until replication is visible.

---

Key Risks Investors Should Expect

This sector carries real structural risk, including:

• FOAK cost inflation and schedule slippage,

• financing delays & potential dilution,

• regulatory iteration cycles,

• supplier qualification risk,

• customer withdrawal or scope revision.

The primary investor danger is capital being deployed:

• too early,

• too concentrated,

• ahead of execution proof.

Patience, diversification across the ecosystem, and allocation discipline are essential.

---

Bottom-Line Investor Conclusions

Modular nuclear is:

• an industrial manufacturing transformation story,

• a long-cycle infrastructure buildout,

• and a capital-discipline environment — not a speculative technology sprint.

The most credible investment strategy is:

Ecosystem first
Manufacturing & EPC second
Developers only as controlled optionality

Invest where:

• cash flows already exist,

• replication improves economics,

• and execution progress can be independently verified.

Narratives will come and go.

Execution will determine who wins.

ED NOTE:

We own stock in Cameco

"lithium is no longer just an EV story. It’s becoming an AI story. A big one"!

"Lithium is becoming an AI story — as artificial intelligence accelerates data center growth, massive new energy storage capacity will be needed, and lithium is at the core of that infrastructure."

---

⚡️ Smackover Lithium — A Strategic Resource for the AI & Energy Storage Era

🧠 Why Lithium Is Now an AI Story

The rise of AI and machine learning has triggered explosive growth in data centers — and those facilities demand huge amounts of constant and backup power.

• As more AI servers come online, energy storage will become essential to keep data flowing even during outages or demand spikes.

• Lithium-ion batteries, already dominant in EVs, are now being deployed at scale in AI-enabled data centers, grid storage, and backup power arrays.

• This means lithium is no longer just about electric vehicles — it’s about powering the AI economy.

---

📍 What Is Smackover Lithium?

Smackover Lithium is a large-scale lithium brine project in the U.S. Southeast. It aims to supply high-grade lithium from underground brine reservoirs — ideal for EVs, grid batteries, and AI-driven data center storage.

• The project spans southern Arkansas and east Texas, sitting atop the Smackover Formation, a vast underground structure filled with mineral-rich brine.

• Unlike hard-rock lithium mining, brine projects like Smackover offer lower surface impact and can be processed with cleaner, faster DLE technology.

---

📦 How Big Is It?

• U.S. Geological Survey estimates the Smackover Formation could host 5+ million metric tons of lithium — one of the largest in North America.

• The project has two main zones:

  • SWA Project (Southwest Arkansas) — Flagship development site with high lithium concentrations (437 mg/L average)

  • East Texas (Franklin Project) — Newly announced resource area with some of the highest lithium-in-brine grades recorded in the U.S. (up to 806 mg/L)

---

🛠 Who Owns & Operates It?

Company	Role	Ownership
Standard Lithium (SLI)	Operator, technology provider	55%
Equinor ASA (EQNR)	Strategic partner, capital provider	45%

• Standard Lithium is a lithium tech company using Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE).

• Equinor, a global energy giant (formerly Statoil), is supplying capital and deep expertise in subsurface development.

---

⚙️ Technology Edge: Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE)

Smackover Lithium uses DLE, a newer process that:

• Pulls lithium directly from brine using selective filters.

• Eliminates large evaporation ponds.

• Returns most water to the ground, reducing environmental footprint.

• Achieved >99% lithium recovery in pilot operations.

This makes Smackover more scalable, cost-efficient, and ESG-friendly than older methods.

---

💵 Recent Big Developments (2025)

💰 1. Over $1 Billion in Project Finance Interest

• Smackover Lithium received expressions of interest from major export credit agencies — including U.S. EXIM Bank and Export Finance Norway — and global banks.

• These groups are interested in providing over $1.1 billion in senior debt to help fund Phase 1 of the SWA project (total capex ~$1.45B).

• The project also received a $225 million U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) grant.

📌 Why this matters: Big, institutional money doesn’t chase hype — it follows viability. This shows Smackover is seen as real, scalable, and strategic.

---

📈 2. Positive Feasibility Study Completed

• In September 2025, Smackover Lithium released a Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) showing:

  • Strong project economics

  • 22,500 tonnes per year lithium output (Phase 1)

  • Project NPV (net present value): $1.7 billion+

📌 This is a critical step before a final decision to build (expected late 2025).

---

🌎 3. New Resource Discovery in Texas

• East Texas “Franklin Project” was added with a maiden inferred resource.

• Contains extremely high lithium grades (up to 806 mg/L) — among the best in North America.

• Offers optional scale-up potential beyond Arkansas.

---

🏭 Location Advantage

• Smackover sits close to major U.S. industrial hubs, auto factories, and battery makers.

• Can serve EV, grid storage, and data center battery clients with minimal transport costs.

• Qualifies for U.S. tax credits, subsidies, and IRA incentives.

---

📊 Why It’s Interesting for Small Investors

• Lithium is now essential for AI infrastructure — not just EVs.

• Smackover is:

  • One of the most advanced brine lithium projects in the U.S.

  • Supported by government funding AND major private capital.

  • Environmentally better than many other lithium projects.

• This is a real project, not a concept — and it's backed by a Fortune 100 energy partner (Equinor).

---

⚠️ What to Watch

• Final Investment Decision (FID) still pending (target: late 2025)

• Lithium price fluctuations could affect economics

• Execution risk (construction, permitting, scaling)

• Potential for equity dilution if more capital is needed

---

✅ Bottom Line

Smackover Lithium is shaping up to be a flagship U.S. lithium project, positioned at the intersection of:

• EV boom

• Grid storage revolution

• AI-powered energy demand

Backed by Equinor, a $225M DOE grant, and over $1B in financing interest, this project may soon become a major domestic lithium supplier.

🔋 Lithium isn’t just for EVs anymore — it’s powering the AI era. Smackover might be one of the first North American projects to meet that demand.

Nuclear ETFs - Why we bought the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR)

 

Report: Nuclear Energy in the AI Era

Executive Summary

As the AI era advances, the demand for clean, reliable, and high-capacity energy sources is intensifying. Nuclear energy, with its ability to provide consistent baseload power and zero-carbon emissions, is emerging as a pivotal solution to power AI-driven data centers and modern energy grids. This report examines the role of nuclear energy in supporting the AI ecosystem, highlights key companies involved, and discusses why small investors might consider the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) to gain exposure to this evolving market.

---

1. Nuclear Energy's Role in the AI Era

a. AI Data Centers' Energy Demands:

• AI data centers require substantial energy due to the computational intensity of machine learning and neural networks.
• Tech giants like Microsoft and Google are exploring nuclear energy as a stable, carbon-neutral alternative to fossil fuels.

b. Grid Reliability for AI Applications:

• AI-driven applications in healthcare, autonomous transportation, and industrial automation depend on uninterrupted power.
• Nuclear power offers stability that intermittent renewables (e.g., wind, solar) cannot match without costly storage solutions.

c. Government Support:

• Governments worldwide, including the U.S., are incentivizing the development of advanced nuclear technologies such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to ensure grid reliability while meeting climate goals.

---

2. Companies Supplying Nuclear Energy

Several companies are positioned to support AI data centers and modernized energy grids with nuclear energy solutions: 

Here are the top ten holdings within this ETF (NLR)

a. Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG):

• Operates the largest fleet of nuclear power plants in the U.S.
• Entered into agreements with Microsoft to supply carbon-free energy to data centers.
• Exploring innovative reactors to support decentralized energy systems.

b. Cameco Corporation (CCJ):

• One of the world's largest uranium producers, essential for nuclear energy production.
• Engages in uranium mining and refining, supplying fuel for nuclear reactors globally.

c. Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (PEG):

• Operates nuclear power plants contributing to the energy mix.
• Investing in infrastructure to support increased electricity demand from AI applications.

d. BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT):

• Provides nuclear components and services to the U.S. government and commercial customers.
• Involved in the design and manufacture of nuclear reactors and fuel.

e. Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC):

• Engages in uranium mining and exploration, focusing on low-cost, environmentally friendly in-situ recovery methods.
• Positioned to supply uranium for expanding nuclear energy needs.

f. PG&E Corporation (PCG):

• Operates the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, California's last nuclear power facility.
• Provides a significant portion of the state's carbon-free electricity.

g. NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE):

• A development-stage company with high-grade uranium projects in Canada.
• Aims to become a leading supplier of uranium for nuclear reactors.

h. Denison Mines Corp. (DNN):

• Engaged in uranium exploration and development, with projects in the Athabasca Basin region of Canada.
• Focused on becoming a significant uranium producer.

i. NuScale Power Corporation (SMR):

• Developing Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) designed for flexible and scalable nuclear power generation.
• Received U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval for its SMR design.

j. Oklo Inc. (OKLO):

• Focused on developing micro-reactors for decentralized power generation.
• Aims to provide clean energy solutions for remote areas and data centers.

---

3. Why Invest in the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR)?

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers diversified exposure to companies involved in uranium mining and nuclear energy, making it an attractive option for small investors aiming to capitalize on the growth of nuclear energy in the AI-driven economy.

Key Benefits of NLR:

a. Diverse Holdings:

• Includes leading companies across uranium mining, nuclear power generation, and advanced nuclear technology.
• Top holdings: Constellation Energy, Cameco Corporation, and Public Service Enterprise Group.

b. Positioned for Growth:

• The rising demand for nuclear energy, coupled with AI and electrification trends, underpins the ETF’s growth potential.

c. Cost-Effective Investment:

• Offers access to a broad range of nuclear companies without the need for individual stock selection.
• Expense ratio of 0.61%, competitive within the sector.

d. Performance Highlights:

• Delivered a year-to-date return of approximately 28.83% as of December 5, 2024.
  
  
  

---

4. Risks to Consider

a. Regulatory and Political Risks:

• Nuclear projects are highly regulated, and delays or policy changes could affect company earnings.

b. High Initial Costs:

• Advanced reactors and infrastructure require substantial upfront investments, posing risks in competitive markets.

c. Market Volatility:

• Uranium prices and public sentiment toward nuclear energy can create short-term volatility.

---

5. Conclusion

The convergence of nuclear energy and AI represents a significant investment opportunity. As the backbone of the AI era's energy infrastructure, nuclear power is poised to grow in relevance and profitability. For small investors, the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers an accessible, diversified, and well-positioned vehicle to participate in this market.

Recommendation: Investors seeking to capitalize on clean energy trends, AI-driven demand, and the modernization of energy grids should consider a strategic allocation to NLR as part of their portfolio.

---

Note: All financial data is as of December 9, 2024. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consider their financial situation and investment objectives before making investment decisions.

Related Articles:

As super data centers begin to proliferate and the nuclear option is discussed more and more, Cameco Corp's Uranium will be a vital resource and a crucial component of energy futures