"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"

Monday, June 8, 2026

June 8th, This week in our Retire fund portfolio! Antennae up!

 

Signals this week are mixed-to-cautiously bullish with elevated correction risk, especially because the Nasdaq and S&P are trading near historically stretched multiples while macro risks are reappearing. This week, I would characterize the setup as “uptrend intact, but fragile.”

The Bull Case (Why markets may still move higher this week)

Despite expensive valuations, three forces continue to support North American equities:

  1. AI capex and earnings momentum remain very strong
    Large-cap technology and semiconductor spending are still accelerating. Institutions continue to treat AI as a multi-year infrastructure cycle rather than a short-term hype phase. That has kept flows into the Nasdaq despite high multiples.
  2. Corporate earnings are still outrunning recession fears
    Wall Street strategists remain broadly constructive on 2026 because earnings growth expectations have held up better than feared. Goldman recently raised its S&P target, arguing earnings growth is offsetting valuation concerns.
  3. Rate-cut expectations still matter (but are wobbling)
    Markets still expect eventual easing, which supports high-multiple growth stocks. However, stronger economic data has recently pushed bond yields higher, complicating the “multiple expansion” story.

The Bear Case (Why this week could turn volatile)

This is where I think investors need to pay close attention:

1. Valuations are stretched

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq are near record highs with multiples that leave little room for disappointment. Historically, when markets get this expensive, good news is priced in quickly, but bad news hits hard.

2. Bond yields are rising again

One of the biggest risks to high-growth stocks is rising yields. When yields climb, future earnings get discounted more heavily — and richly valued tech names feel it first. This matters especially for AI leaders and the “second derivative” names you follow.

3. Geopolitical and inflation risks are back

Oil volatility, Middle East tensions, tariff uncertainty, and sticky inflation are resurfacing as risks. Reuters noted that stronger jobs data and renewed inflation concerns have already pressured tech sentiment heading into this week.

4. Narrow leadership = warning sign

A lot of the gains remain concentrated in a relatively small group of AI-related winners. When breadth narrows too much, markets often become more vulnerable to pullbacks.

My Base Case for This Week (June 8 week)

Probability-weighted view:

ScenarioProbabilityWhat it looks like
Range-bound / mild pullback~45%2–5% weakness in Nasdaq; profit-taking in AI leaders
Continued melt-up~35%Markets shrug off valuation concerns and grind higher
Sharp correction~20%Inflation/yields or geopolitics trigger 5–10% selloff

Given the setup, I would expect higher volatility and sector rotation rather than a market crash. The most likely outcome is choppiness with selective weakness in expensive AI names while industrials, defense, energy, financials or value rotate in and out.

For someone with our thesis (AI + quantum + defense + silver/critical materials), I would be more inclined to:

  • Trim extended winners only if position sizing has become outsized
  • Keep dry powder for forced selloffs in quality AI infrastructure names
  • Expect silver, defense and energy-adjacent names to potentially act as partial hedges if inflation/geopolitics rise again
  • Focus on second-tier picks-and-shovels rather than only the mega-caps at peak multiples

One metric I would watch closely this week: the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield. If yields keep climbing while the Nasdaq stays expensive, the probability of a meaningful pullback rises materially. Conversely, if yields settle, the AI rally can continue longer than most expect.

A fair way to summarize the market right now is:

“Fundamentals still support higher prices, but valuations mean the market is increasingly unforgiving.”

Given our existing themes (AI infrastructure, quantum, defense/NATO, silver/critical materials, biotech) and the current setup of high multiples + rising yield risk, I would frame this week as a “barbell market”: investors may continue chasing AI winners while simultaneously rotating into hard assets, defense, and cash-generating businesses.

Scenario A: Market Continues Higher This Week (“Melt-Up”)

Most likely winners (ranked):

1. AI Infrastructure / Picks-and-Shovels (highest probability of alpha)

This remains the strongest momentum trade if yields stabilize.

Why: Institutions are still underweight relative to the size of the AI buildout. Spending on networking, memory, optics, power, and cooling continues regardless of short-term macro noise.

Best-positioned categories:

  • Networking / interconnect
    • Marvell Technology
    • Credo Technology Group
    • Broadcom
  • Memory / HBM
    • Micron Technology
  • Cooling / power
    • Vertiv Holdings
    • Eaton

What tends to outperform in melt-ups:
The second-tier AI names (our preferred hunting ground) often outperform the Magnificent Seven because they are less crowded and still rerate upward.

2. Defense / NATO Buildout

If geopolitical headlines intensify, defense could outperform even during a broad rally.

Canadian names we already favor:

  • Kraken Robotics
  • Volatus Aerospace

U.S./Europe anchors:

  • Palantir Technologies
  • Rheinmetall
  • RTX Corporation
  • Equinor

Why this week:
Defense increasingly behaves like a structural growth sector, not just a recession hedge.

3. Quantum (High Beta)

If risk appetite remains strong, speculative capital may flow back into quantum names.

Highest-beta public proxies:

  • IonQ
  • D-Wave Quantum
  • Rigetti Computing

But: these are highly rate-sensitive. Rising yields can reverse momentum quickly.


Scenario B: 2–5% Pullback / Correction This Week

If yields rise or inflation fears intensify, I would expect this rotation:

1. Precious Metals & Silver (best hedge in our framework)

This aligns closely with our thesis.

Why silver may outperform in a wobble:

  • Safe-haven demand
  • Industrial AI/datacenter/robotics demand
  • Persistent supply tightness

our favorites remain strong:

  • First Majestic Silver
  • Endeavour Silver 

Also strong:

  • Pan American Silver
  • Wheaton Precious Metals

ETF/holding hedge:

  • Sprott Physical Silver Trust

2. Energy / Utilities / Power Infrastructure

If inflation reaccelerates, power infrastructure may quietly outperform.

Interesting names:

  • GE Vernova
  • Siemens Energy
  • BWX Technologies

3. Profitable Cash-Flow AI Enablers

If markets wobble, speculative AI often sells off first while profitable tollbooth names hold better.

Examples:

  • Nasdaq (Verafin thesis)
  • Qualcomm
  • International Business Machines

What Usually Gets Hit First in a Correction

These are the categories I’d expect to struggle first:

  1. Unprofitable high-beta AI stories
  2. Small-cap speculative quantum
  3. Long-duration biotech (especially pre-revenue)
  4. Overextended semis trading at extreme multiples

That means names like smaller quantum/speculative biotech can become opportunities, but often after the first flush lower, (which occurred last week)

My Ranking of “This Week” Opportunity Buckets

If market stays strong:

  1. AI infrastructure
  2. Defense/NATO
  3. Quantum
  4. Silver miners
  5. Biotech

If market weakens:

  1. Silver / precious metals
  2. Defense
  3. Power infrastructure
  4. Profitable AI tollbooths
  5. High-beta AI after selloff

The One Thing I Would Watch Daily This Week

If the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rises sharply and the Nasdaq still rallies, that divergence usually breaks one way or another — and often violently.

Rule of thumb this week:

  • Yield down / stable → risk-on
  • Yield up sharply → expect rotation or pullback
  • Oil spike + yield spike → silver & defense likely outperform

For a Canadian retail investor in our position, this looks less like a week to “go all in” and more like a week to prepare buy lists and scale into weakness selectively rather than chase.


Thursday, June 4, 2026

The case for owning silver stocks/ETFs at a time of severe shortages in this precious/technology metal

 




SILVER 2026–2030

Investment/Business Report Including Optimal TFSA Weighting Strategy


Executive Summary

Silver has evolved into one of the world’s most strategically important commodities.

Historically viewed as a precious metal, silver is now increasingly essential to:

  • AI infrastructure
  • Robotics
  • Data-center electrification
  • Aerospace
  • EV systems
  • Grid modernization
  • Defense technologies
  • Renewable energy

At the same time, silver still functions as:

  • a hard asset
  • inflation hedge
  • monetary protection
  • geopolitical safe haven

This creates a rare dual-demand dynamic:

Silver benefits when technology booms AND when monetary systems weaken.

That combination is unusual.

Gold tends to benefit primarily from fear.

Silver can benefit from growth + fear simultaneously.


Why Silver Matters in the AI/Robotics Era

Why our core thesis is increasingly being validated.

AI is not merely software.

It is an industrial and electrical buildout.

The world is now constructing:

  • hyperscale data centers
  • robotics factories
  • autonomous systems
  • power networks
  • electrical switching systems
  • advanced semiconductors
  • defense electronics

Silver is deeply embedded throughout this infrastructure because it has:

The highest electrical conductivity on Earth

The highest thermal conductivity

Exceptional reliability in high-performance electronics

This is why silver appears in:

  • servers
  • semiconductors
  • connectors
  • relays
  • robotics
  • EVs
  • aerospace electronics
  • precision military systems

The AI revolution is therefore partly a metals story.

And silver is increasingly one of its hidden beneficiaries.


The Structural Silver Deficit

This is perhaps the strongest pillar of the thesis.

Silver has entered repeated annual deficits where:

demand > supply

And the market cannot easily fix it.

Why?

Because most silver is not mined intentionally.

Roughly 70%+ comes as a by-product of:

  • copper mining
  • zinc mining
  • lead mining
  • gold mining

Meaning:

Even much higher silver prices may not rapidly increase supply.

This is different from gold.

The result:

prolonged shortages become possible.

That is one reason many institutional investors increasingly 

view silver as a strategic scarcity asset.


Analysis of our Four Holdings

1. Endeavour Silver Corp.

Role: Mid-Cap Silver Torque

EDR gives us leveraged exposure to rising silver prices.

Silver miners often move 2–5x faster than silver itself in bull markets because margins expand dramatically.

Why we own it

✔ Production leverage

✔ Expansion optionality

✔ Re-rating potential

✔ Strong upside in silver squeeze scenarios

Risks

✘ Mexico operational risk

✘ Execution risk

✘ High volatility

Role in TFSA

Growth engine


2. First Majestic Silver Corp.

Role: High-Beta Silver Conviction Play

AG has historically behaved like a high-octane silver vehicle.

Few silver miners react as aggressively to sentiment and metal price appreciation.

Why we own it

✔ High silver sensitivity

✔ Strong retail following

✔ Brand power in silver investing

✔ Potential upside in squeeze environments

Risks

✘ Extremely volatile

✘ Can fall hard in corrections

✘ Emotionally difficult to hold

Role in TFSA

Alpha accelerator


3. XGD

Role: Precious Metals Shock Absorber

This stabilizes the portfolio.

While silver miners may move violently, XGD offers:

  • larger miners
  • diversified precious metals exposure
  • gold downside protection

Gold tends to outperform during:

  • recessions
  • financial stress
  • liquidity crises

Why own it

✔ Lower volatility

✔ Diversification

✔ Crisis hedge

✔ Better drawdown control

Role in TFSA

Emotional stabilizer


4. Sprott Physical Silver Trust

Role: The “Real Silver” Core

This is your pure bullion exposure.

No mine failures.

No cost overruns.

No political risk.

Just silver.

Why own it

✔ Direct silver ownership

✔ Physical backing

✔ No mining risk

✔ Long-term monetary hedge

Role in TFSA

"Foundation asset"!


The Weighting Question

Maximum Alpha While Still Sleeping at Night

Asking the right question.

The answer depends on balancing:

upside potential

against

psychological survivability

three models.


OPTION 1 — “Sleep at Night / High Conviction”

Best balance for most investors

HoldingWeight
PSLV35%
XGD30%
AG20%
EDR15%

Why this works

You still participate strongly if silver runs.

But drawdowns become manageable.

If miners crash temporarily, your bullion + gold exposure softens the blow.

Expected personality fit

8/10 confidence for your TFSA


OPTION 2 — “Maximum Alpha but Still Rational”

My preferred fit I would advise for family members

HoldingWeight
PSLV30%
AG30%
EDR25%
XGD15%

Why I like this for style

This aligns closely with:

  • our AI infrastructure thesis
  • robotics conviction
  • silver scarcity belief
  • willingness to own volatility

Yet:

45% remains defensive

(PSLV + XGD)

while

55% is torque

(AG + EDR)

This could materially outperform if silver enters a true secular bull market.

Why this may be ideal

You are still able to:

“sleep at night”

without sacrificing meaningful upside.

Expected personality fit

9/10 fit for you


OPTION 3 — “Aggressive Silver Supercycle”

Maximum upside / hardest emotionally

HoldingWeight
AG40%
EDR35%
PSLV20%
XGD5%

Reality check

This could massively outperform.

But:

You must emotionally tolerate:

-40% to -50% drawdowns

even if the long-term thesis remains intact.

Most investors fail psychologically here.

Expected personality fit

6/10 for your TFSA

(too emotionally demanding)


My Preferred Recommendation

If I were optimizing specifically for:

TFSA tax efficiency

Silver supercycle exposure

AI/robotics tailwinds

High alpha potential

Ability to hold through volatility

I would lean toward:

30% PSLV / 30% AG / 25% EDR / 15% XGD

Why?

Because it accomplishes four things:

1. Maintains direct silver exposure

(PSLV)

2. Captures explosive upside

(AG + EDR)

3. Avoids becoming emotionally unmanageable

(XGD stabilizer)

4. Preserves TFSA compounding

Remember:

Inside a TFSA:

5–10x winners become extraordinarily powerful because gains are tax free.

That favors selectively embracing volatility.


One Additional Suggestion

Given our conviction level:

I would also consider a dynamic weighting model.

During silver pullbacks:

add to EDR/AG

During euphoric silver spikes:

trim miners slightly

Move gains into PSLV

This slowly converts:

speculative upside → hard-asset security

over time.

That is often how long-term precious-metals investors quietly compound wealth through cycles.

My overall view:

This four-position setup is actually quite sophisticated for a retail investor because it combines:

physical silver + torque + diversification + monetary protection

rather than betting entirely on one outcome.

ED Note:  Regarding compression (see above) silver appears now to be at an inflection point for a push much higher.


Saturday, May 23, 2026

As Anthropic and OpenAi begin the IPO dance, we look at some second tier plays that shoukd return more alpha

The Year of Mega IPOs 

Why Second-Tier Infrastructure Companies Could Produce the Greatest Alpha



A Retail Investment Thesis Built Around MRVL + CRDO


Executive Summary

Many retail investors will instinctively try to buy the coming AI IPOs:

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • potentially future agentic AI leaders and infrastructure platforms

That instinct may be wrong.

Historically, the largest wealth creation in platform revolutions often came not from the headline companies, but from the second-tier tollbooths enabling the ecosystem.

Think:

  • Internet → Cisco, Qualcomm, Broadcom
  • Smartphones → TSMC, Qualcomm, ASML
  • Cloud → Nvidia, Arista, Equinix
  • EVs → semiconductor and battery suppliers

The argument here is:

The largest risk-adjusted AI alpha from 2026–2029 may not come from buying Anthropic or OpenAI at trillion-dollar valuations. It may come from owning the infrastructure companies required to make them function.

That is where the MRVL + CRDO thesis becomes compelling.

Anthropic and OpenAI are both increasingly expected to pursue IPOs in 2026, amid extraordinary investor enthusiasm around frontier AI. Recent reporting suggests OpenAI and Anthropic could be among the largest IPOs in history, with valuations approaching the trillion-dollar range.


Part 1: Why 2026 Could Be “The Year of AI IPOs”

The market is entering what could become:

The public monetization phase of the AI revolution

We are moving from:

Phase 1 (2023–2025)

GPU scarcity / model training

Winner:

  • NVIDIA

Phase 2 (2025–2027)

Agentic AI deployment

Winners:

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • enterprise AI ecosystems

Phase 3 (2026–2029)

Infrastructure scaling

Likely winners:

  • networking
  • optics
  • interconnect
  • memory movement
  • AI compute orchestration

This shift matters enormously.

The market is beginning to realize:

AI does not scale linearly.

Every leap in intelligence requires:

  • exponentially more bandwidth,
  • lower latency,
  • greater memory movement,
  • more energy efficiency,
  • larger AI clusters.

Anthropic’s rapid growth and massive compute commitments illustrate the scale of infrastructure required. 

Recent reports indicate Anthropic has committed to extraordinary compute spending and is scaling aggressively to support Claude and future agentic systems.


Part 2: Why Buying Anthropic/OpenAI IPOs May Not Produce the Best Alpha

This may sound counterintuitive.

But by IPO:

OpenAI and Anthropic may already be priced for perfection.

Potential issues:

1. Massive valuations

Reports now discuss valuations:

  • OpenAI: ~$850B–$1T
  • Anthropic: hundreds of billions approaching $1T

At those levels:

future upside becomes mathematically harder.

A stock at a $900B valuation doubling to $1.8T is possible—but far harder than a $60–$100B infrastructure supplier tripling.


2. Capital intensity risk

AI model companies burn extraordinary capital.

Anthropic reportedly spends billions on compute and infrastructure to maintain frontier capability.

Retail investors may discover:

Owning the “brains” is expensive.

Sometimes:

owning the shovels is better!


3. Commoditization risk

Over time:

Claude, GPT, Gemini, xAI, and others may compete aggressively.

Margins could compress.

But:

the infrastructure still gets paid.

Whether OpenAI wins or Anthropic wins:

"Data still moves no matter who wins or how systems eventually commoditize".


Part 3: The Real Bottleneck = Moving Intelligence

This is the core thesis.

Most investors still think:

AI = chips.

That is increasingly incomplete.

The next bottleneck appears to be:

data movement

Meaning:

Compute cannot function without:

  1. Networking
  2. Interconnect
  3. Optical systems
  4. Memory fabrics
  5. Low-power transmission

This framework is becoming increasingly correct:

GPU boom → networking boom → photonics boom


Part 4: Why MRVL Matters

Marvell Technology = The “AI Infrastructure Backbone”



Marvell sits at the intersection of:

  • custom AI silicon
  • networking
  • optical interconnect
  • cloud AI scaling
  • hyperscaler architecture

Importantly:

Marvell is deeply tied to Amazon Trainium, which is highly relevant because Anthropic increasingly depends on AWS infrastructure. 

Amazon and Anthropic expanded their collaboration in 2026 around Trainium compute and large-scale cloud commitments.

Why MRVL could outperform expectations

Marvell is selling:

"The roads AI travels on"!

Whether:

  • Anthropic wins,
  • OpenAI wins,
  • xAI wins,
  • or all of them win,

Marvell still benefits.

That diversification matters.

Strengths

✔ Lower risk than smaller AI names
✔ Multiple hyperscaler exposure
✔ AWS/Trainium leverage
✔ AI networking leadership
✔ Strong institutional ownership

Weakness

❌ Already well discovered by Wall Street


Part 5: Why CRDO Matters

Credo Technology Group = The Hidden AI Bottleneck



This is the higher-alpha piece.

Credo focuses on:

  • high-speed connectivity
  • optical DSPs
  • Active Electrical Cables (AECs)
  • ultra-efficient interconnect

As AI clusters become larger:

bandwidth becomes everything.

Credo increasingly positions itself as a connectivity-at-scale company for hyperscaler AI environments, with major pushes into optical solutions for AI fabrics.

Recent growth has been explosive, driven by hyperscaler demand and AI networking expansion.

Why CRDO could become a multi-bagger

Because investors may still underestimate:

how much data movement Agentic AI requires.

Agentic systems are not simple chatbots.

They reason.

They call tools.

They chain models.

They coordinate across systems.

That creates:

massively larger networking demand.


Part 6: The Combined Thesis

Why MRVL + CRDO together makes sense

Building an

AI Tollbooth Portfolio

MRVL = stability + platform exposure
CRDO = asymmetric upside + networking torque

Why this pairing works

FactorMRVLCRDO
RiskLowerHigher
UpsideStrongVery High
Anthropic relevanceHighIndirect but meaningful
Agentic AI leverageHighExtremely high
Valuation riskModerateHigher
Hyperscaler exposureBroadConcentrated

The combination reduces risk while preserving upside.


Suggested Retail Allocation

For a retail investor seeking:

alpha without excessive concentration risk

I currently favor:

60% MRVL / 40% CRDO

Why?

Because:

MRVL acts as the anchor, while CRDO provides the torque.

In portfolio construction terms:

MRVL lowers the probability of catastrophic disappointment.

CRDO raises the probability of outsized returns.


Risks to the Thesis

1. AI capex slowdown

If hyperscalers pause spending:

Both stocks may correct sharply.

2. IPO disappointment

If OpenAI/Anthropic IPOs underperform:

AI sentiment could temporarily weaken.

3. Valuation compression

Especially for CRDO.

4. Networking commoditization

Competition from:

  • Broadcom
  • Nvidia
  • internal hyperscaler solutions

Bottom Line

The smartest way for a retail investor to play the Year of AI IPOs may not be buying the IPOs themselves.

Instead:

buy the companies that must win regardless of which AI lab dominates.

Among second-tier infrastructure companies:

MRVL + CRDO is one of the strongest two-stock AI infrastructure theses I currently see for 2026–2029

because it aligns directly with what I believe becomes the next great bottleneck:

"The movement of intelligence itself"!

Ed Note:

I have no current shares of either MRVL or CRDO at present, but have placed them on our watch list for now!


Thursday, May 21, 2026

Nasdaq Inc (NDAQ) acquired a hidden gem in 2020 - the market may still be underestimating the strategic value of Verafin!

 I see Nasdaq, Inc. as a potentially very strong “infrastructure layer” investment for the next phase of digital finance, and I believe the market may still be underestimating the strategic value of Verafin!



This thesis is materially stronger than many investors realize:


Why Verafin Matters More Than Most Investors Think

Verafin is not just another fintech tool.

It is becoming part of the compliance and trust layer of modern digital payments.

That distinction matters enormously.

As financial systems move toward:

  • instant settlement,
  • AI-driven transactions,
  • cross-border digital wallets,
  • tokenized assets,
  • embedded finance,
  • and potentially “everything apps” like X,

the single biggest bottleneck becomes:

“How do you stop fraud, sanctions violations, money laundering, scams, terrorist financing, and synthetic identity attacks in real time?”

That is exactly where Verafin operates.


Why This Could Become Critical for Musk’s X Ecosystem

If Elon Musk successfully transforms X into:

  • a payments network,
  • banking interface,
  • remittance platform,
  • commerce system,
  • AI-agent transaction layer,
  • or digital identity/payment rail,

then X will eventually collide head-on with:

  • AML regulations,
  • KYC obligations,
  • fraud detection,
  • suspicious activity reporting,
  • sanctions screening,
  • cross-border compliance,
  • and real-time transaction monitoring.

Those are not optional.

They are existential requirements.

A company that cannot satisfy regulators:

  • cannot scale payments globally,
  • cannot connect to banks,
  • cannot custody value,
  • and cannot operate legally across jurisdictions.

That is why companies like Verafin become strategic infrastructure.


The Hidden Moat

Nasdaq did something extremely intelligent when it bought Verafin for US$2.75B in 2020.

They effectively acquired:

  • network-level fraud intelligence,
  • behavioral financial crime analytics,
  • regulatory relationships,
  • bank integrations,
  • and AI-enhanced transaction monitoring.

Today, Verafin supports thousands of financial institutions and monitors trillions in assets.

That creates:

  • data network effects,
  • switching costs,
  • compliance entrenchment,
  • and institutional dependency.

Financial institutions rarely rip out core compliance systems once installed.

Especially when regulators trust them.


Why AI Actually Strengthens Verafin’s Position

This is the important part most investors miss:

AI may massively increase fraud.

Nasdaq Verafin’s own 2026 report states:

  • AI-driven financial attacks are surging,
  • fraud losses are accelerating,
  • and institutions are rapidly increasing AI spending for detection systems.

That means:
the more powerful AI becomes,
the more valuable real-time fraud infrastructure becomes.

This is similar to:

  • cybersecurity during the cloud era,
  • or Nvidia during the AI compute era.

The complexity explosion creates demand for the “safety layer.”


Why Nasdaq (NDAQ) Is Interesting Here

Many investors still think of Nasdaq as:

“the stock exchange company.”

But increasingly it is:

  • financial software,
  • surveillance,
  • compliance,
  • analytics,
  • anti-financial-crime infrastructure,
  • and market technology.

Verafin shifts Nasdaq toward recurring SaaS-like revenue and away from pure exchange cyclicality.

That transformation is strategically important.


Bull Case for NDAQ (2026–2030)



The thesis:

Nasdaq becomes:

  • a picks-and-shovels provider for digital finance,
  • a compliance backbone for AI-era payments,
  • and a trusted institutional infrastructure provider.

Potential tailwinds:

  • AI-driven fraud explosion,
  • faster payments adoption,
  • stablecoin regulation,
  • tokenization,
  • cross-border digital transactions,
  • embedded banking,
  • X/payments ecosystems,
  • CBDCs,
  • open banking,
  • digital identity layers.

Risks

Important to keep balanced:

Risks include:

  • slower fintech/payment adoption,
  • regulation slowing “super apps,”
  • competition from firms like:
    • Palantir Technologies
    • Fiserv
    • FIS
    • ACI Worldwide
    • BioCatch
  • large banks building internal AI fraud systems,
  • valuation compression if markets weaken.

Is It a Good Buy “Now”?

From a long-term strategic perspective:
I would classify NDAQ as:

  • lower-risk than most fintech plays,
  • more durable than many AI hype names,
  • and potentially underappreciated as a “financial infrastructure AI” company.

For a retail investor, I would view it as:

  • a compounder,
  • not a meme-style exponential trade,
  • but one that could quietly outperform if digital finance expands the way many expect.

It is not likely a 10–20x stock from here.

But:

  • double-digit compounding,
  • multiple expansion,
  • and increasing strategic importance
    are very plausible over the next 5–10 years.

My View on the “X + Verafin” Angle

NDAQ bought Verafin in 2020 for very good reasons.

  • systems like Verafin,
  • partnerships with firms like Verafin,
  • or infrastructure dependent on Verafin-class monitoring,
    As it could become mandatory for global digital commerce!

The faster money moves,
the more critical trust infrastructure becomes.

And Verafin is directly positioned in that layer.

Verafin makes Nasdaq, Inc. much more interesting than a traditional “exchange operator”!

That may be especially true for Elon Musk's "X" Money chip creation now being distributed as a credit card.