"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"

Monday, November 2, 2026

Volatus Aerospace newest product may be a game changer

 


The most significant recent proprietary product introduced by Volatus Aerospace (TSX: FLT) is its V-Cortex™ AI Flight Controller and Autonomy Operating System, unveiled May 27, 2026.

It is particularly interesting from a Canadian defence investment perspective.

What does V-Cortex do?

Think of V-Cortex as the intelligent brain of a military drone.

It combines a miniature flight-control computer with AI-enabled software, allowing drones to operate with greater independence from human pilots.

Its principal capabilities include:

  • Flying without GPS: Designed to navigate when satellite signals are jammed or unavailable.

  • Autonomous missions: Enables drones to execute programmed tasks and make certain onboard decisions.

  • Military surveillance: Supports intelligence, reconnaissance and sensor integration.

  • Counter-drone operations: (very important) Can support systems designed to detect, track or respond to hostile drones.

  • Multiple platforms: Designed for integration into different drones and potentially unmanned ground and maritime systems.

Remarkably, the controller measures approximately 3.5 × 3.5 centimetres and weighs less than 15 grams.

GlobeNewswire+1

What's particularly new?

On September 22, 2026, Volatus announced that V-Cortex had successfully completed initial flight testing without GPS or external sensors, using onboard default sensors.

That is a meaningful technical milestone, especially for operations in Canada's Arctic and in electronic-warfare environments. However, additional testing is still required before widespread operational deployment.

Why this matters to FLT shareholders

V-Cortex potentially moves Volatus beyond simply manufacturing and operating drones toward owning proprietary AI and autonomy technology.

That could create higher-value products, licensing opportunities and stronger differentiation in Canadian and NATO defence procurement.

There is also SKYDRA™, introduced in March 2026, a subscription-based software platform for planning and simulating counter-drone operations. It is another example of Volatus expanding into proprietary defence software.

Autonomous Warfare: AeroVironment and Palantir Challenged – Analysts Give Volatus Aerospace the Thumbs-Up

My investment assessment: V-Cortex is potentially one of Volatus's most strategically important technologies. The September flight milestone strengthens its technical credibility, but the next critical step is converting that technology into paying defence customers and recurring revenue.

Kraken Robotics (TSX: PNG) — Updated Investment Note - Oct 30th 2026

 



October 30, 2026 | Investment outlook: 6–18 months

Investment Thesis: Strengthening — Bullish

Kraken Robotics continues to evolve from a specialized Canadian underwater technology supplier into an increasingly important participant in NATO-aligned naval modernization, autonomous mine countermeasures and subsea defence systems.

The company's $24 million in defence orders, announced March 17, included more than 10 customers across five countries, three new defence customers, and another KATFISH sonar sale to the Polish Navy. Importantly, Poland is a repeat customer, having originally selected KATFISH in 2020. This strengthens Kraken's credibility as an established supplier rather than an experimental technology provider.

Kraken Robotics

Important developments

  • Defence orders expanding: In addition to March's $24 million announcement, Kraken disclosed $28 million in battery and sonar orders in April and another $35 million in new orders in July. These announcements demonstrate continued commercial momentum, although they should not be interpreted as entirely incremental revenue without reviewing delivery schedules.

  • Covelya acquisition: The July acquisition substantially expanded Kraken's underwater technology portfolio through Sonardyne, EIVA, Voyis and other specialized businesses, creating opportunities for integrated sensor, navigation, imaging and autonomy solutions.

  • REPMUS 2026: Kraken's recently reported NATO exercise results are particularly encouraging. Its synthetic aperture sonar detected and classified all 21 targets across eight survey areas, while Voyis and EIVA technologies achieved a reported 100% target identification rate. This provides valuable operational validation, although exercise performance does not guarantee future procurement contracts.

  • 2027 opportunity: Increasing NATO emphasis on autonomous minehunting, underwater surveillance and protection of critical subsea infrastructure should favour companies capable of supplying interoperable systems rather than individual components.

Kraken Robotics+1

Financial position and outlook

2026 revenue guidance

C$290–320M

2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance

C$65–75M

Combined 2026 orders announced by Aug. 27

~C$355M

June 30 cash, excluding escrow proceeds

C$91.3M

Company-reported figures. Guidance includes six months of Covelya operations; the C$355M order figure combines both businesses and is not equivalent to recognized revenue.
Kraken Robotics

Investment risks

Kraken's rapid expansion brings acquisition-integration risk, potential shareholder dilution, defence procurement delays and valuation sensitivity. Q2 standalone revenue grew only 4%, and the company recorded a C$7.5 million net loss, highlighting the need to distinguish order momentum from realized earnings.

Kraken Robotics (PNG): Beyond KATFISH — The New Technology Portfolio

Investment and technology review | November 2, 2026

Kraken Robotics is evolving from a specialist in high-resolution underwater sonar into something potentially much more valuable: an integrated supplier of underwater sensing, autonomous navigation, optical imaging, subsea intelligence and advanced batteries.

The acquisition of the Covelya Group companies is particularly significant. It gives Kraken the opportunity to combine technologies that previously belonged to separate businesses into complete underwater surveillance and mine-countermeasure systems.

For investors, the important distinction is between technologies Kraken invented, technologies it acquired, and new integrated capabilities it can now offer.

KATFISH remains a flagship product, but several other technologies deserve attention, particularly those applicable to NATO submarine operations, autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), Arctic surveillance and seabed infrastructure protection.

1. The technologies I consider most important

SeaPower advanced batteries — developed by Kraken

High investment significance

These pressure-tolerant batteries power underwater drones, allowing longer missions without surfacing. Kraken has developed a higher-energy-density design for large and extra-large UUVs, delivering approximately 30% improvement over its previous design, plus a compact design targeting smaller vehicles.

Why it matters: Kraken can supply batteries to competing underwater-drone manufacturers, regardless of whose sonar they use. A 2026 master supply agreement for XL-UUV batteries supports this opportunity.

NEWS RELEASE+1

Circular Synthetic Aperture Sonar (C-SAS) — developed by Kraken

Emerging technology

A dual-frequency sonar system designed to image seabed objects from a full 360-degree range of viewing angles. This can improve object classification and identification beyond conventional straight-line sonar passes.

Why it matters: Potentially valuable for confirming suspicious objects, identifying underwater hazards and inspecting seabed infrastructure. It is a development milestone, not yet evidence of widespread commercial adoption.

NEWS RELEASE

SPRINT-Nav — acquired through Sonardyne

Combines inertial navigation, Doppler velocity measurements and depth sensing to help underwater vehicles know their position when GPS signals cannot reach them.

Why it matters: Navigation is essential for virtually every autonomous underwater vehicle, whether deployed for minehunting, reconnaissance, submarine support or scientific surveys. It creates an opportunity for recurring platform sales beyond sonar.

GlobeNewswire

Sentinel Intruder Detection Sonar — acquired through Wavefront

An underwater security system that automatically detects, classifies and tracks divers, swimmer delivery vehicles and underwater drones approaching protected facilities.

Why it matters: Direct application to naval bases, ports, energy facilities and critical maritime infrastructure. Kraken reported new demand in Europe and the Middle East during 2026.

GlobeNewswire

Discovery Stereo and underwater optical imaging — acquired through Voyis

Advanced underwater cameras and optical perception systems capable of producing detailed imagery and supporting three-dimensional reconstruction of subsea objects.

Why it matters: Sonar finds suspicious objects at distance; optical imaging helps establish precisely what they are. Combining these capabilities can strengthen autonomous mine identification and infrastructure inspection.

NaviSuite and visual SLAM — acquired through EIVA

Software for underwater navigation, mission planning, survey processing and three-dimensional mapping. Visual simultaneous localization and mapping (VSLAM) helps vehicles estimate their position while building a map of their surroundings.

Why it matters: Software can turn separate sonar, camera and navigation products into an integrated autonomous mission capability. It also creates potential for software licensing and ongoing support.

Vigilant Forward-Looking Sonar — acquired through Sonardyne

Detects obstacles ahead of underwater and surface vehicles, helping them navigate safely in complex environments.

Why it matters: Obstacle avoidance is a fundamental requirement for autonomous underwater missions. Kraken reported record deliveries of Vigilant systems in its August 2026 update.

Kraken Robotics

2. Other technologies now within Kraken

Technology

Origin

Strategic application

Multi-Aperture Sonar (MAS)

Covelya

Underwater detection, classification and AUV missions

ScanFish remotely operated towed vehicles

EIVA

Seabed surveys and sensor deployment

Sub-bottom imaging and acoustic coring

Kraken / PanGeo

Locating buried objects and studying seabed geology

Underwater LiDAR

3D at Depth acquisition

Precision 3D inspection of pipelines, cables and infrastructure

Acoustic positioning and underwater communications

Sonardyne

Coordinating autonomous vehicles and underwater assets

Seabed pressure sensors

Covelya portfolio

Persistent subsea monitoring and detection applications

These are established or developing capabilities, not necessarily products invented since the July 2026 Covelya closing. Kraken's August disclosure specifically identified orders for monitoring systems, seabed pressure sensors and ScanFish vehicles.

Kraken Robotics+2

3. The most revealing development: REPMUS 2026

The recent NATO-aligned REPMUS exercise in Portugal provides an important illustration of the acquisition's strategic value.

As you previously highlighted, Kraken reported the following results:

Kraken synthetic aperture sonar

21/21

Targets detected and classified across eight survey areas

Voyis imaging + EIVA software

100%

Reported target identification rate in the exercise

The exercise demonstrated how the technologies complement one another:

Kraken SAS

Detects and classifies potential threats

Voyis optical imaging

Captures detailed images of identified targets

EIVA NaviSuite / VSLAM

Supports localization, mapping and target identification

Integrated underwater intelligence

More complete information for naval operators and autonomous systems

The results are encouraging evidence of interoperability, although controlled exercises do not establish performance under every operational condition.

An important qualification: these systems principally support mine detection, classification and identification. Physical mine neutralization or recovery generally requires additional equipment and procedures.

4. Which technologies have the greatest investment potential?

My ranking is based on addressable markets, potential adoption across multiple platforms and opportunities to increase Kraken's revenue per customer—not on announced product-specific profit margins.

Rank

Technology

2–4 year outlook

1

SeaPower batteries

Very high — growing UUV market and potential production-volume contracts

2

SPRINT-Nav and underwater positioning

Very high — essential equipment across multiple vehicle classes

3

Integrated SAS, Voyis and EIVA systems

High — differentiated end-to-end naval capability

4

Sentinel security sonar

High — ports, naval bases and critical infrastructure

5

Circular SAS

Promising — commercial uptake still needs validation

6

Underwater LiDAR and sub-bottom imaging

Moderate to high — attractive commercial and defence niches

The market opportunity is already extending beyond demonstrations. Kraken reported approximately C$355 million in combined announced 2026 orders by August 27, across Kraken and Covelya, covering products such as batteries, navigation, positioning, sonar and monitoring equipment. This is an announced-orders measure, not recognized revenue or a current backlog figure.

Kraken Robotics+1

5. My investment assessment

I believe the most significant consequence of the Covelya acquisition is that Kraken no longer needs to win the entire underwater-drone contract to benefit from it.

Consider an allied navy commissioning a fleet of autonomous underwater vehicles. Kraken may be able to supply the batteries, navigation, positioning, sonar, imaging and mission software, even when another defence contractor builds the vehicle itself.

This is a potentially powerful business model because it broadens Kraken's customer base and increases the value of its components on each platform.

It is particularly relevant to NATO's increasing interest in persistent underwater surveillance, protection of subsea cables and pipelines, and autonomous operations in challenging maritime environments.

The principal investment risks remain acquisition integration, defence procurement delays, competition from established naval technology suppliers, and the possibility that the share price already discounts substantial growth.

My conclusion: SeaPower batteries and the acquired Sonardyne navigation technologies could ultimately be as important to Kraken's commercial growth as KATFISH. The combination of Kraken SAS, Voyis optical imaging and EIVA software may become its most differentiated integrated defence offering.

The next evidence I would watch is whether Kraken begins winning substantial contracts explicitly bundling several of these technologies together, rather than selling individual components.

That would be a meaningful indication that the Covelya acquisition is delivering strategic value beyond simply adding six established companies and their existing revenues.



Investment verdict — BUY/HOLD, with discipline

My outlook remains bullish for 2027. Kraken's combination of advanced sonar, subsea batteries, autonomous systems integration and established NATO customer relationships gives it an increasingly attractive competitive position.


Monday, October 26, 2026

Nasdaq 100 - Growing concerns about excessive AI infrastructure spending, elevated technology valuations and increasingly complex financing arrangements

 

Nasdaq 100 vs CPI

Nasdaq-100: Are Institutional Investors Preparing for a Correction?

Update | October 26, 2026

The Investment Picture

Growing concerns about excessive AI infrastructure spending, elevated technology valuations and increasingly complex financing arrangements have raised questions about the sustainability of the Nasdaq's AI-driven rally.

However, the available short-selling, options and futures positioning data suggest a cautious market, but not one uniformly positioned for a major correction.

What the Numbers Tell Us

  • Magnificent Seven: Reported short interest remains relatively modest, generally below 2% of float, except Tesla at approximately 2.24%. Nvidia, Meta and Amazon experienced increases during the latest comparison period, while Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet experienced decreases.

  • QQQ options: The reported put/call open-interest ratio was approximately 1.45 on October 23, suggesting substantial downside protection, although not necessarily outright bearish speculation.

  • Nasdaq futures: The previously reviewed CFTC figures indicated that leveraged funds had substantially reduced their net short positions over the preceding three months, while asset managers remained net long.

  • Overall Nasdaq short interest: Reported shares sold short increased approximately 2.2% between July 31 and September 30.

Where the Real Risk Lies

The greater threat may not be short sellers, but the financial commitments underpinning the AI revolution.

Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and other technology giants are investing enormous amounts in data centres, advanced semiconductors and power infrastructure. Increasing financing obligations, uncertain future returns and concentrated market leadership create vulnerabilities if AI monetization fails to keep pace with spending.

A disappointment in earnings, financing conditions or anticipated AI returns could trigger a broad market repricing, even without substantial short-selling activity.

Investment Verdict: CAUTIOUS — NOT YET BEARISH

The available evidence supports defensive positioning and selective profit-taking, but does not yet establish a compelling case for aggressively shorting the Nasdaq.

Investors should monitor whether rising short interest among major technology companies coincides with increasing QQQ put demand and renewed institutional futures selling.

That combination would represent a stronger warning of a potential market correction.

Data Sources and Reporting Limitations

This assessment relies on several reporting systems with different publication schedules, methodologies and limitations:

  1. Nasdaq/FINRA short interest: Published twice monthly, generally approximately 8–10 business days after the reporting settlement date. The company-specific figures used in this assessment primarily reflect September 30, 2026, positions, not live October 26 positions. Short interest measures outstanding short positions, not daily short-selling volume.

  2. QQQ options: The cited October 23 put/call figures represent a snapshot of options positioning. High put open interest does not necessarily indicate bearish speculation; positions may represent hedging, spreads or market-making activity. The figures were obtained from third-party analytics rather than independently reconciled exchange-level records.

  3. CFTC Nasdaq-100 futures: Commitments of Traders reports normally reflect Tuesday positions and are published Friday. These reports aggregate positions by trader category and do not disclose individual institutions, trading intentions or complete exposure across stocks, ETFs and other derivatives. The previously cited October 20 figures have not been independently reconciled against the underlying CFTC dataset.

  4. Percentage of float: Short-interest percentages may vary between data providers because of differences in free-float estimates, share-class treatment, corporate actions and reporting dates.

  5. Historical comparisons: The July–October analysis combines observations from different dates and reporting sources. It is not a fully synchronized, independently audited 90-day dataset.

Important qualification: These indicators help assess investor positioning and market sentiment. They cannot independently establish institutional intentions, predict the timing of a correction or determine whether the Nasdaq is fundamentally overvalued.

Primary reference sources:

Bottom line: The Nasdaq's greatest vulnerability may be the enormous expectations already reflected in AI-related valuations. The risks warrant close monitoring, but the available positioning data do not confirm that a major downturn is imminent.

Monitoring established: Weekly review of Magnificent Seven short interest, QQQ options positioning and CFTC Nasdaq-100 futures activity. Figures reflect the latest reporting periods available for the October 26 assessment, rather than live trading positions.

Sunday, October 18, 2026

Should We Be Concerned About the Nasdaq? Is the Ai boom creating a financial bubble?

Nasdaq Vs CPI 10 years

 | Retire.Fund | October 18, 2026

Is the AI Boom Creating a Financial Bubble?

The Nasdaq has been one of the greatest beneficiaries of the artificial intelligence revolution. However, beneath the excitement surrounding AI, quantum computing and autonomous technologies, several financial warning signs are emerging that investors should not ignore.

Our concern is not that AI will fail. It is that the enormous cost of building AI infrastructure could create a financial crisis for some of the companies and institutions financing it.

1. Too Much Market Concentration

The Nasdaq-100 has become heavily dependent on a handful of technology giants, including Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Apple and Tesla.

Together, these companies represent an exceptionally large portion of the index. (37%)

Consequently, disappointing financial results from just a few could trigger a substantial market correction.

This concentration becomes particularly concerning when several of these companies are simultaneously committing extraordinary amounts of capital to AI infrastructure.

2. The AI Capital Expenditure Explosion

Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta are collectively spending hundreds of billions of dollars building data centres, purchasing advanced semiconductors and securing electricity supplies.

The financial question is increasingly straightforward:

Will AI generate sufficient revenue and profits to justify this unprecedented investment?

Rising depreciation expenses, rapid technological obsolescence and pressure on free cash flow could eventually force companies to reduce their infrastructure spending.

That would have consequences not only for the hyperscalers but also for semiconductor manufacturers, networking companies, construction firms and power infrastructure suppliers.

3. The Hidden Debt Problem

Perhaps the most troubling development is the growing use of special-purpose financing vehicles, joint ventures and private-credit arrangements.

Meta provides an important example. Its multibillion-dollar data-centre partnerships involve substantial project-level borrowing, long-term lease commitments and financial guarantees.

Although these arrangements can comply with accounting regulations, they make it more difficult for investors to assess the complete financial exposure associated with AI infrastructure development.

The danger is that losses could spread beyond technology companies into private-credit funds, insurers, pension funds and lending institutions.

This does not mean a banking crisis is inevitable, but the financial interconnectedness deserves considerably more scrutiny.

4. CoreWeave: A Warning Sign?

CoreWeave, a major provider of AI computing infrastructure, has experienced significant pressure in its debt markets, with yields on certain bonds recently reaching approximately 15–16%.

Such borrowing costs raise serious questions about the long-term economics of heavily leveraged AI infrastructure businesses.

CoreWeave could become an early warning indicator of broader financing difficulties.

The historical comparison is the telecommunications boom of the late 1990s. Internet adoption ultimately transformed the global economy, yet many companies financing the infrastructure suffered enormous losses when investment exceeded near-term commercial demand.

AI could follow a similar path: the technology succeeds, while some of the investors financing its expansion lose substantial amounts of money.

5. November's U.S. Elections Add Uncertainty

The November 3 midterm elections introduce another potential source of market volatility.

Changes in congressional control could influence technology regulation, investigations into financing practices, energy policy and the economics of data-centre construction.

However, the election itself is unlikely to determine the Nasdaq's direction. Corporate earnings, credit conditions and interest rates remain more important.

The approaching quarterly earnings reports from major technology companies may provide the clearest indication of whether AI spending is translating into sustainable profits.

6. Is It Time to Short the Nasdaq?

We believe the case for protecting technology portfolios has strengthened.

The combination of market concentration, enormous capital expenditures, complex financing arrangements and deteriorating credit conditions presents a credible risk of a significant correction.

Nevertheless, shorting the Nasdaq outright carries substantial risks. Technology stocks can rally sharply even when fundamental concerns remain unresolved.

A more measured approach might involve reducing excessive technology exposure, maintaining greater cash reserves or using modest, defined-risk hedging strategies.

For Canadian investors, unleveraged inverse Nasdaq ETFs or carefully structured put options may offer alternatives to outright short selling. These instruments have their own risks and require active management.

Our Investment Outlook

Nasdaq Outlook: CAUTIOUS — Elevated Correction Risk

Investment Horizon: Next 3–12 Months

We are not predicting an imminent financial collapse. 

The largest technology companies remain highly profitable, and ... 

demand for AI computing continues to expand.

However, investors should recognize that the financial foundations supporting the AI infrastructure boom are becoming increasingly complex and capital-intensive.

Investors should closely monitor:

  • Free cash flow and capital expenditure guidance from major technology companies.

  • Credit-market stress at CoreWeave and other heavily financed AI operators.

  • Private-credit exposure and off-balance-sheet financial commitments. (Meta comes to mind)

  • Signs of slowing data-centre construction or equipment orders.

  • Nasdaq market breadth and the performance of its largest constituents.

The Bottom Line

Yes, we should be concerned about the Nasdaq — not because the AI revolution is ending, but because investors may be underestimating the financial risks associated with building it.

The Nasdaq's concentration in a handful of technology giants creates the possibility that financial disappointment in relatively few companies could affect the entire index.

The greatest risk may be that investors are correctly anticipating the technological future while overpaying for the companies and infrastructure required to deliver it.

Our preferred strategy is caution rather than panic: 

protect capital, avoid excessive leverage, maintain liquidity and be prepared for opportunities if valuations correct.

The AI revolution may be only beginning. That does not mean every company financing it will be a successful investment.


Retire.Fund Investment Research — October 18, 2026

This commentary is intended for general investment information and does not constitute personalized financial advice. Market scenarios are uncertain, and investment strategies involving short positions or derivatives can produce substantial losses.

(Monitoring the Nasdaq-100)

Saturday, October 3, 2026

Kraken Robotics 60,000 Sq Ft Battery Plant is now operational

 


October 2026 — Update to our August 7, 2025 article

When we wrote our original article, “Kraken Robotics – NATO Navy supplier is moving up the ladder with massive, undersea battery facility!”, one of the most important pieces of our investment thesis was Kraken Robotics' planned 60,000-square-foot SeaPower™ battery manufacturing facility in Nova Scotia.

At the time, it was still a plan.

Today, it is becoming an operating asset — and Kraken Robotics itself has evolved into a considerably larger company.Kraken Robotics Update: The Battery Expansion We Were Waiting For

From Promise to Production

In August 2025, Kraken had committed approximately C$10 million to establish the Nova Scotia facility. Management expected it to substantially increase SeaPower battery manufacturing capacity and ultimately help bring total potential battery production toward C$200 million annually.

That expansion is no longer theoretical.

Kraken subsequently confirmed completion of the new Nova Scotia manufacturing facility, and in March 2026 CEO Greg Reid said battery manufacturing there was coming online.

The company's April investor presentation subsequently identified Halifax, Nova Scotia and Rostock, Germany as its battery manufacturing locations.

This gives Kraken something increasingly important in the rapidly expanding autonomous-underwater market:

Significant SeaPower battery manufacturing capability on both sides of the Atlantic.

And The Customers Are Arriving

Capacity means little without demand.

This is where the story becomes particularly interesting.

In January 2026, Kraken announced C$35 million in SeaPower battery sales to three customers.

In March, Kraken announced another approximately C$24 million of defence orders across SeaPower batteries, KATFISH and Kraken SAS.

In April, another C$28 million in SeaPower battery and SAS orders followed, involving five customers. Kraken said its technology was then integrated, or being integrated, into more than 30 different UUV platform types worldwide.

The company has therefore moved well beyond proving that SeaPower works.

It is increasingly about scaling production.

The XL-UUV Development May Be Even More Important

One development since our original article deserves particular attention.

Kraken has signed a long-term Master Supply Agreement with a major international conglomerate developing extra-large unmanned underwater vehicles — XL-UUVs.

The customer has not been publicly identified.

That means we should not speculate that it is any particular defence contractor.

But the size of these underwater vehicles helps explain why this opportunity matters.

Kraken's April 2026 investor material indicated that an XL-UUV can contain approximately 50–60 of its 20-kWh SeaPower battery modules.

That changes the economics considerably.

A future in which large autonomous submarines are produced in meaningful numbers could require substantially more battery capacity than today's smaller UUV market.

And Kraken has been building the manufacturing infrastructure to participate in exactly that market.

A Better Battery Opens Another Market

Kraken has also introduced a more compact SeaPower architecture offering approximately a 30% improvement in energy density.

That is strategically important because SeaPower is no longer aimed principally at very large underwater vehicles.

The new architecture allows Kraken to address small and medium-sized UUVs as well.

Kraken therefore potentially participates across much of the autonomous underwater spectrum:

Small UUV → Medium UUV → Large UUV → XL-UUV

For an investor, this may ultimately be more important than any single battery contract.

Kraken is attempting to become an enabling technology supplier to the broader underwater-autonomy industry.

Kraken Is No Longer The Company We Wrote About In August 2025

There has been another major change.

Kraken completed its acquisition of Covelya Group in July 2026.

That brought businesses including Sonardyne, EIVA, Voyis, Wavefront Systems and others into the organization.

Kraken's technology portfolio now spans much more of the underwater stack:

CapabilityKraken/Covelya exposure
Subsea powerSeaPower batteries
Synthetic Aperture SonarKraken SAS
Mine huntingKATFISH
Underwater navigationSonardyne
Acoustic positioning & communicationsSonardyne
Mission/survey softwareEIVA
Optical subsea imagingVoyis
Intruder detection & forward-looking sonarWavefront
Subsea services/LiDAR3D at Depth

This is a very different company from the relatively specialized Canadian ocean-technology business we originally followed.

The Numbers Are Scaling Too

Kraken reported C$102.2 million of revenue and C$25.0 million of Adjusted EBITDA for 2025.

Following the Covelya acquisition, management's 2026 guidance increased dramatically.

Kraken currently expects:

Revenue: C$290–C$320 million

Adjusted EBITDA: C$65–C$75 million

Adjusted EBITDA margin: approximately 22%–23%

Perhaps even more significant, by the end of Q2 Kraken and Covelya had announced approximately C$355 million of combined 2026 orders.

This does not mean C$355 million automatically becomes 2026 revenue. Order timing and revenue recognition matter.

But it demonstrates the scale of the opportunity now confronting the company.

Why The Nova Scotia Plant Matters More Today Than It Did In 2025

When we first wrote about the plant, we viewed it primarily as a capacity expansion.

Today we see it somewhat differently.

It is potentially a strategic piece of North American allied-defence manufacturing infrastructure.

Kraken can manufacture subsea batteries in Canada while maintaining its European battery operation in Germany.

That provides geographic diversification and puts production closer to North American customers at precisely the time when autonomous maritime systems are becoming increasingly important to Western defence planning.

And the plant includes multiple pressure-testing tanks rated to 6,000 metres.

This is specialized infrastructure, not a conventional battery assembly operation.

Our Investment Thesis Has Evolved

Our original thesis was relatively simple:

Kraken possessed excellent subsea sonar and battery technology and was positioned to benefit from growing NATO and commercial demand for autonomous underwater systems.

We believe the thesis has broadened considerably.

Kraken is increasingly becoming a subsea technology platform supplying many of the technologies required to make autonomous underwater systems work:

POWER → NAVIGATION → COMMUNICATION → SONAR → IMAGING → SOFTWARE → DATA

The Nova Scotia SeaPower facility fills an especially important part of that stack: power and endurance.

Without sufficient energy storage, an autonomous underwater vehicle cannot stay underwater longer, travel farther or carry increasingly sophisticated sensor payloads.

That makes battery technology a potentially valuable technological chokepoint.

What We Are Watching Now

The next question is no longer:

“Will Kraken build the Nova Scotia battery plant?”

It has.

The questions for shareholders now become:

How quickly will production ramp?

How much of the potential C$200 million annual battery capacity can Kraken utilize?

Will the XL-UUV supply agreement turn into large recurring production orders?

How quickly will new small- and medium-UUV customers adopt the higher-density SeaPower architecture?

And finally:

Can Kraken successfully integrate Covelya while maintaining the growth and margins investors now expect?

Those are the metrics that should increasingly determine the investment case through 2027 and 2028.

Investment Perspective — October 2026

Our August 2025 article described a promising Canadian defence-technology company investing aggressively ahead of anticipated demand.

Fourteen months later, several pieces of that thesis have materially advanced.

The Nova Scotia battery plant has been completed.

SeaPower orders have increased.

Kraken has gained additional defence customers.

Its technology is being integrated across more than 30 UUV platform types.

A long-term battery agreement has been signed with a manufacturer developing XL-UUVs.

And the Covelya acquisition has transformed Kraken into a substantially larger international subsea-technology company.

There are still important risks: Covelya integration, execution, working-capital requirements, contract timing, defence procurement delays and the challenge of filling newly installed manufacturing capacity.

But there is an important distinction between the Kraken story of August 2025 and the Kraken story today:

In 2025, investors were largely buying the expectation of scale.

In late 2026, we are beginning to see that scale being built and commercialized.

Ed Note

We originally added to our PNG position on August 7, 2025 because we believed Kraken was sitting at the intersection of several long-duration trends: NATO naval modernization, autonomous underwater vehicles, mine warfare, subsea infrastructure protection and offshore energy.

The opening of the Nova Scotia SeaPower manufacturing operation strengthens that thesis.

In our view, the next major milestone is not another factory announcement.

It is utilization.

If Kraken can progressively fill this new battery capacity with recurring UUV and particularly XL-UUV production orders, the Nova Scotia facility could become one of the more important growth assets inside the expanded Kraken organization.

That is what we will be watching closely through 2027.

Further: the connections between the new German made subs being stationed in Halifax NS with Canada's East Coast Navy, the German battery manufacturing plant, The idea that these subs will eventually be "command platforms" for XLUUV clusters, and the fact that the Arctic is a major concern of CAF cannot be ignored either. 

Currently there is no factual evidence for these connections however, I have learned over many years that,  "If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, It's probably a duck!

We've been busy adding to our position!

Previous Articles:

Kraken Robotics in a great position to help supply NATO navies with their sub sea technology!


Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Smallcap Drone and autonomous systems stocks are catching the eye of U.S. and Canadian retail investors

 


Drone & Autonomous Defense Stocks — October 2026

Our five-company drone/autonomous-systems basket provides exposure across air, counter-drone, public safety and subsea defence. Going into October, the opportunity remains compelling, but valuations and execution risk vary considerably.

1. VOLATUS AEROSPACE — FLT.TO

Price: C$0.54 | October view: Most attractive entry

Volatus combines Canadian drone manufacturing, ISR, cargo/logistics, services and its developing V-Cortex autonomy platform. The shares have retreated from C$0.64 on September 23 to C$0.54 despite important operational progress.

Most importantly, Volatus has secured a five-year CAF tactical ISR contract: 100 systems initially, with options for another 4,900. The options are not guaranteed orders, but they establish a potentially important procurement pathway.

Investment case: At approximately C$0.54, FLT offers an attractive combination of depressed share price, improving balance sheet, Canadian sovereign-drone exposure and substantial defence optionality.

October stance: BUY/ACCUMULATE


2. KRAKEN ROBOTICS — PNG.V

Price: C$4.35 | October view: Highest-quality business

Kraken isn't an aerial-drone company; it provides the underwater component of the autonomous-defence thesis through sonar, subsea batteries, mine-hunting technology and marine robotics.

Q2 revenue was C$27.3M with C$5.0M adjusted EBITDA. More importantly, Kraken and newly acquired Covelya had approximately C$355M of announced 2026 orders combined.

At C$4.35, PNG remains roughly 32% below its beginning-of-year level, despite the considerably larger business created by Covelya.

Investment case: Of these five, Kraken has the strongest combination of established revenue, profitability, proprietary technology, naval/NATO exposure and backlog visibility.

October stance: BUY/ACCUMULATE


3. ONDAS — ONDS

Price: US$7.49 | October view: Highest growth

Ondas has evolved into a much larger autonomous-defence platform. TTM revenue is now approximately US$174M, while its expanding portfolio includes autonomous drones, counter-UAS and U.S. defence programs. Its market capitalization is approximately US$4.27B.

The attraction is enormous growth and contract momentum; the risks are equally clear: acquisition integration, high spending and a valuation that already anticipates considerable future success.

Investment case: Excellent growth exposure, but significantly more expensive than FLT and much more complex operationally.

October stance: BUY ON WEAKNESS / HOLD EXISTING


4. WRAP TECHNOLOGIES — WRAP

Price: US$1.40 | October view: Speculative

WRAP is the smallest and most speculative holding. Q2 revenue doubled to US$2.1M and gross margin reached roughly 75%. The company subsequently raised US$12M to expand WrapShield into public safety, federal defence and counter-UAS applications.

At roughly US$1.40 and an US$86M market capitalization, expectations are much lower than for ONDS or DPRO.

Investment case: Interesting asymmetric speculation, but WrapShield and the defence strategy still need commercial validation.

October stance: SMALL SPECULATIVE HOLD/ADD


5. DRAGANFLY — DPRO

Price: US$6.17 | October view: Watch

DPRO has become considerably more interesting. It won essentially the same CAF tactical ISR framework opportunity as Volatus—100 initial systems with options for another 4,900—and qualified across all five Canadian Defence Drone Initiative streams.

Furthermore, Unusual Machines and a U.S. investment fund have invested US$10M at US$5.35/share, strengthening DPRO's U.S. defence connections.

The problem is valuation. At US$6.17 DPRO carries an approximately US$231M market cap against only US$6.37M TTM revenue—a roughly 36× price/sales multiple. Shares outstanding have also increased substantially over the past year.

Investment case: Excellent strategic potential, but investors are already paying heavily for revenue that hasn't arrived yet. Around the US$5.35 strategic-financing level, the risk/reward would become more interesting.

October stance: WATCH

October 2026 — Capital Priority

FLT → PNG → ONDS → WRAP → DPRO

For new money in October, FLT and PNG stand out for different reasons. FLT offers the more asymmetric Canadian drone/defence opportunity at today's depressed C$0.54 price, while PNG provides the stronger operating business, positive adjusted EBITDA and substantial defence order book.

ONDS remains an important growth holding but doesn't need to be chased. WRAP warrants only a small speculative allocation until its new defence strategy produces meaningful contracts.

And DPRO stays on the watch list. The company is becoming strategically interesting, but at US$6.17 the valuation is difficult to justify from current revenue. A retreat toward US$5.35 or below, or a major new contract that materially changes expected revenue, would warrant another look.

Bottom line

Going into October, I would concentrate incremental drone/autonomy capital primarily in Volatus and Kraken, retain Ondas as the larger high-growth U.S. autonomy position, keep WRAP small and speculative, and wait for a better DPRO entry or stronger contract confirmation.

Monday, September 28, 2026

The Qualcomm-Amazon deal - and how Qualcomm and Nvidia fit in Robotics development!

 


On September 8, 2026, Qualcomm announced a multi-generation AI data-center partnership with Amazon/AWS. This is considerably more important than a conventional chip-supply agreement because it gives Qualcomm a credible path into the hyperscale AI market alongside its existing Meta relationship. Qualcomm

What Amazon and Qualcomm are doing

There are really three pieces to the agreement.

1. Custom AI silicon for AWS. Qualcomm and Amazon will jointly develop customized chips for AWS's large-scale AI infrastructure, with a particular emphasis on AI inference—running trained AI models rather than training them. Qualcomm's pitch is power efficiency: generating more AI output per watt, which becomes increasingly important as hyperscalers run into power and cooling constraints. Qualcomm

2. Qualcomm gets into AWS's AI networking infrastructure. This may be almost as interesting as the processors. Qualcomm will provide technology for high-speed optical connectivity, including links extending to 1.6 Tbps and future generations, using its SerDes and optical-DSP technology. In other words, Qualcomm isn't merely trying to sell Amazon an AI processor—it wants silicon inside the networking fabric connecting AI servers and racks. Qualcomm Investor Relations

3. Amazon received warrants tied to potentially enormous purchases. Qualcomm issued Amazon warrants for 25 million QCOM shares at $161.26 per share, representing roughly $4 billion if exercised. Importantly, those warrants vest in stages tied to commercial arrangements and Amazon purchases that could reach $60 billion of Qualcomm server chips and related technology. Reuters

That last point requires some care: this does not mean Qualcomm has booked a guaranteed $60 billion order. The structure gives Amazon incentives as purchases scale toward that amount. Qualcomm's own announcement does not disclose firm unit volumes or a detailed deployment schedule. Qualcomm

Why I think this matters so much for Qualcomm

This reinforces our thesis around QCOM: Qualcomm is evolving from

Smartphones to Edge AI → Physical AI → Data-center AI infrastructure.

And Amazon is now a powerful validation point.

Qualcomm unveiled its Dragonfly data-center portfolio this year, covering CPUs, AI accelerators, custom silicon and connectivity. Meta already agreed to use Qualcomm's Dragonfly C1000 CPUs in next-generation servers. Amazon now adds a second hyperscaler relationship, centered on custom inference silicon and connectivity. Data Center Dynamics

The emerging picture looks something like:

Amazon AWS
↓
Qualcomm custom AI silicon
↓
AI inference
↓
Qualcomm SerDes / optical DSP
↓
1.6T+ data-center networking

That is a dramatically larger addressable market than Qualcomm's traditional Snapdragon handset franchise.

The $60-billion number is especially interesting

For perspective, Reuters reports that Qualcomm is targeting $15 billion of annual data-center chip revenue by 2029. The Amazon arrangement gives some credibility to what previously looked like a very ambitious target. Reuters

The warrant structure also creates unusual alignment. If Qualcomm's technology works well and Amazon dramatically increases purchases, Amazon can become a meaningful Qualcomm shareholder.

There is a downside: if all 25 million warrants ultimately vest and are exercised, existing QCOM shareholders face some dilution. But that dilution would occur in connection with very substantial commercial purchases, so investors need to evaluate the dilution against the revenue generated.

Why Amazon wants Qualcomm

AWS already develops its own silicon—Graviton CPUs, Trainium AI accelerators and Inferentia inference chips. So Amazon isn't abandoning custom silicon and simply buying Qualcomm processors.

Rather, Qualcomm brings intellectual property and engineering expertise in areas Amazon increasingly needs: low-power compute (Robotics), custom silicon, high-speed SerDes, optical DSPs, system integration and inference optimization. Data Center Dynamics

This fits an important change occurring in AI. Training giant models made NVIDIA GPUs indispensable. But as hundreds of millions of users and AI agents continuously run those models, inference becomes an enormous workload of its own.

Qualcomm is effectively betting:

AI inference will eventually dwarf AI training in volume, and electricity efficiency will become one of the industry's most important competitive advantages.

That's precisely where Qualcomm's decades of designing high-performance processors under severe power constraints become relevant.

What it means for the QCOM investment thesis

For someone evaluating Qualcomm primarily as a smartphone-chip company, this agreement changes the picture materially. 

The company now has credible exposure to hyperscale AI compute + custom silicon + AI networking + edge AI + automotive + robotics/physical AI.

The principal risk is execution. Amazon has not guaranteed $60 billion of purchases, NVIDIA remains extraordinarily entrenched, and Qualcomm must prove that Dragonfly/custom silicon can move from design wins into large-scale production revenue.

But Amazon joining Meta as a major hyperscaler relationship makes Qualcomm's data-center ambitions substantially harder to dismiss as merely a roadmap.

For our QCOM thesis specifically, I consider the Amazon agreement one of the most important developments we've seen this year. It strengthens the part of the thesis that had previously been the least proven: Qualcomm becoming a serious AI data-center infrastructure supplier, while the edge/robotics opportunity remains intact.

The Edge Edge!

Qualcomm has an “edge at the edge” because much of the next wave of AI will move out of giant data centres and into physical devices—robots, humanoids, vehicles, drones, industrial machines, PCs and smartphones—where AI must operate locally, instantly and with limited battery power.

This is precisely where Qualcomm has spent decades building expertise: highly power-efficient processors that combine CPU, GPU, NPU/AI acceleration, connectivity, cameras, sensors and real-time processing in compact systems. 

While NVIDIA dominates centralized AI training, Qualcomm's particular opportunity is AI inference at the physical edge, where sending every decision back to the cloud is too slow, expensive or unreliable.

 If Physical AI develops as expected, Qualcomm's competitive advantage could therefore be its ability to put a powerful, energy-efficient “AI brain” directly inside millions of intelligent machines—an “edge at the edge.”

Robotics:

Qualcomm now has several concrete relationships with robotics manufacturers, including humanoid companies. The most significant are Figure and NEURA Robotics, and Qualcomm says its processors are already powering robots from other OEMs including Booster and VinMotion. Qualcomm

The relationships break down like this:

Robotics companyQualcomm relationshipSignificance
Figure AICollaborating to define the next generation of compute architecture for Figure's humanoidsVery important
NEURA RoboticsLong-term strategic collaboration; Dragonwing processors + NEURA humanoids/robotsVery important
Booster RoboticsDragonwing processors already powering humanoid platformsCommercial ecosystem
VinMotionDragonwing processors powering humanoid platformsCommercial ecosystem
KUKA RoboticsDiscussions/collaboration around next-generation robotics solutionsIndustrial robotics opportunity
Advantech / AutoCoreAMR and industrial robotics developmentIndustrial Physical AI
PickNik RoboticsQualcomm agreed this month to acquire it; owns/stewards MoveIt robotics softwareStrategically important

Qualcomm describes the Dragonwing IQ10 as essentially the "brain of the robot"—a processor designed specifically for advanced AMRs and full-sized humanoids. It integrates CPU, NPU/AI acceleration, vision, sensor processing, connectivity and real-time control. Qualcomm

1. Figure is the one I watch most closely

Figure AI and Qualcomm announced in January that they are collaborating on the next generation of compute architecture as Figure scales its humanoid platforms. 

Figure CEO Brett Adcock specifically highlighted Qualcomm's combination of compute performance and energy efficiency as a building block for scaling Figure's humanoids. Qualcomm

This is particularly interesting because Figure is trying to manufacture humanoids at very large scale.

The relationship suggests Qualcomm wants to occupy a position analogous to:

NVIDIA → AI servers

Qualcomm → autonomous robots / Physical AI

It is far too early to say Qualcomm will achieve that position, but that is clearly the strategic direction.

2. NEURA Robotics is an even broader agreement

NEURA Robotics and Qualcomm announced a long-term strategic collaboration in March 2026.

This goes considerably beyond supplying a processor.

They're developing what the companies call a "Brain + Nervous System" reference architecture for robots. Qualcomm supplies Dragonwing compute, AI acceleration, connectivity and software; NEURA contributes the robot hardware and embodied-AI stack. The architecture is intended for robotic arms, AMRs, service robots and humanoids. Qualcomm

That is exactly the type of relationship I'd want to see if the thesis is that Qualcomm becomes a major picks-and-shovels supplier to Physical AI.

3. Qualcomm silicon is already inside humanoid platforms

Qualcomm says its Dragonwing industrial processors already power humanoid robots from Booster Robotics and VinMotion, among other robotics manufacturers. Its newer IQ10 reference-design program also includes NEURA, Booster and VinMotion as early-access ecosystem partners. Qualcomm

So this isn't entirely a 2028–2030 story. There is hardware being developed and deployed now.

4. And Qualcomm just made another very interesting move

Only five days ago—September 23—Qualcomm announced an agreement to acquire PickNik.

PickNik is the longtime steward of MoveIt, one of the most widely used open-source software frameworks for robotic motion planning and manipulation.

Qualcomm intends to integrate MoveIt much more tightly with Dragonwing. That potentially gives Qualcomm both:

Robot hardware compute: Dragonwing
+
Robot software/motion layer:
MoveIt
+
AI inference:
Qualcomm NPU
+
Connectivity:
Wi-Fi/5G/6G
+
Real-time control:
Dragonwing robotics architecture**

That's strategically much more interesting than merely selling chips. Qualcomm

But there are some conspicuous absences

I don't find evidence of announced Qualcomm compute agreements with Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics or Apptronik.

For example, Apptronik's disclosed AI relationship is with Google DeepMind; its latest Apollo 2 announcement describes fleets collecting real-world data to develop humanoid AI models in partnership with DeepMind. Apptronik

And I would not assume Tesla is a future Qualcomm customer. Tesla has strong incentives to develop its own Optimus compute architecture.

Why this strengthens the QCOM thesis we've been discussing

This is where our interest in Qualcomm as a Physical AI investment becomes increasingly relevant. Qualcomm is building an actual robotics ecosystem rather than simply claiming that Snapdragon-type processors could someday be used in robots. Qualcomm

And the timing is interesting because Qualcomm's Dragonwing IQ10 can deliver up to 700 TOPS, while supporting as many as 20 cameras plus lidar/radar and real-time control—all designed around relatively power-efficient edge computation. Qualcomm

That potentially puts Qualcomm into three enormous AI markets simultaneously:

Amazon/Meta → Data-center AI

PCs/phones/automotive → Edge AI

Figure/NEURA/Booster/VinMotion → Physical AI & humanoids

That third category was considerably more speculative when we first discussed the "sleeping dragon" QCOM thesis. As of September 2026, it is becoming much more tangible.