"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Quantum Tech leader, Infleqtion reports will go public via SPAC - How to invest!

  • Investment & Business Report: Infleqtion (via Churchill Capital Corp X – CCCX)

    1. Company Overview

    • Founded: 2007 (as ColdQuanta, rebranded Infleqtion in 2022).

    • Headquarters: Boulder, Colorado, with global operations (US, UK, Australia).

    • Specialty: Neutral-atom quantum technology across computing, sensing, and signal processing.

    • Approach: Uses ultra-cold neutral atoms controlled by lasers, allowing scalable, high-fidelity qubit arrays and multiple product lines (computing, clocks, sensors).


    2. Technology & Achievements

    • Neutral-Atom Platform

      • Built 1,600-atom arrays with 99.73% two-qubit fidelity.

      • Demonstrated logical qubits (real-world error correction, rare among competitors).

    • Quantum Computers

      • Delivered three commercial quantum computers to customers.

      • Building a utility-scale machine in Illinois, supported by $50M state investment, targeting 100 logical qubits in the near term.

    • Sensing Products

      • Tiqker (quantum clock) — precision timing without GPS.

      • Quantum RF sensors — detect signals invisible to classical systems.

      • Inertial navigation — deployed in defense (Royal Navy, GPS-denied environments).

    • Software & AI

      • Contextual Machine Learning (CML) — hybrid quantum/classical AI platform, integrated with NVIDIA CUDA-Q ecosystem.


    3. Partnerships & Ecosystem

    • Government: NASA, U.S. DoD, DARPA, U.K. National Quantum Computing Centre.

    • Corporate: NVIDIA, Boeing, L3Harris, Ball Aerospace.

    • Academia: University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Colorado, University of Sydney.

    • Commercial Pipeline: Over $300M+ potential contracts, with $50M+ booked backlog.


    4. Financial Profile

    • Revenue: ~$29M trailing twelve months (TTM).

    • Booked Business: ~$50M.

    • Pipeline: $300M+ identified opportunities.

    • SPAC Valuation: ~$1.8B pre-money.


    5. The SPAC Deal (CCCX)

    • Churchill Capital Corp X (CCCX) raised ~$360–414M in its IPO.

    • PIPE investment: $126.5M at $10/share.

    • Target Close: Late 2025 to early 2026.

    • Pro Forma Valuation: ~$1.8B.

    • Structure Advantage: Infleqtion already has revenues + delivered products, unlike some quantum peers that went public pre-revenue.


    6. Growth Catalysts

    • Illinois Utility-Scale Quantum Computer milestones (100 logical qubits).

    • New defense & government contracts (timing/navigation in GPS-denied settings).

    • Expansion in AI integration with NVIDIA partnerships.

    • SPAC close + market debut (potential re-rating vs peers like IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave).


    7. Risks

    • SPAC Redemption Risk: High redemption could limit cash raised.

    • Execution: Scaling from 1,600 physical qubits to error-corrected logical qubits is technically challenging.

    • Competition: Neutral-atom rivals (QuEra, Pasqal) + ion-trap leaders (IonQ, Quantinuum) + photonics firms (Xanadu).

    • Post-de-SPAC Volatility: Many quantum SPACs saw post-IPO declines before stabilizing.


    8. Investment Outlook

    • Why Attractive:

      • Real products + revenue.

      • Government and corporate backing.

      • Large addressable market across computing + sensing + AI.

      • Positioned to lead in neutral-atom race (with QuEra & Pasqal).

    • Ways to Play:

      • Common shares of CCCX → exposure to deal close + business operations.

      • Warrants → leveraged upside but capped returns.

    • Upside Potential: If execution succeeds, Infleqtion could trade in line with IonQ (~$2–3B market cap) or surpass it with sensing/commercial diversification.


    9. Peer Comparison Snapshot

    CompanyTech TypeMarket Cap (approx)Revenue TTMNotes
    InfleqtionNeutral atoms$1.8B (SPAC target)$29MMulti-product (computing + sensing)
    IonQTrapped ions$2.3B~$27MLeading commercial deployments
    RigettiSuperconducting$160M~$13MStruggling financially
    D-WaveAnnealing$120M~$8MNiche but steady
    PasqalNeutral atomsPrivateN/ABacked by France + AWS collabs
    QuEraNeutral atomsPrivateN/AHarvard/MIT spinout

    10. Summary

    Infleqtion is not just hype — it’s one of the most credible quantum technology firms today. With:
    ✅ Delivered products & real revenue
    ✅ Large government & corporate partnerships
    ✅ Neutral-atom leadership & roadmap to logical qubits
    ✅ Sensing products already in defense & aerospace

    It sits at the intersection of quantum computing, AI, and defense technology, with a clearer commercial path than many peers.

    The CCCX SPAC merger provides public-market investors a chance to enter at a ~$1.8B valuation, with both upside potential (if milestones are met) and execution risk (typical for frontier tech).


    🔮 Infleqtion: Bull vs. Bear Case Scenario Analysis

    🐂 Bull Case (Upside)

    • Execution & Scale:
      Infleqtion delivers on its Illinois utility-scale neutral-atom quantum computer (100 logical qubits) by 2026, positioning it as the first neutral-atom player with commercially relevant error-corrected machines.

    • Revenue Growth:
      Revenues accelerate from $29M (TTM) → $150M–$200M by 2027, driven by:

      • Defense contracts (navigation, clocks, RF sensing).

      • Cloud-based quantum computing access via Oqtant platform.

      • AI partnerships (CUDA-Q integration, hybrid quantum-classical AI).

    • Valuation Re-Rate:

      • Trades at 10–12× forward sales, in line with high-growth frontier tech (similar to IonQ’s valuation multiples).

      • Market cap expands to $3–5B by 2027.

    • Catalysts Supporting Bull Case:

      • Illinois facility milestone hit early.

      • Large NATO/DoD/UK defense contracts.

      • AI/enterprise adoption with NVIDIA synergy.

      • Low SPAC redemption → healthy cash runway.

    Bull Case Price Range (2026–2027):

    • $20–30/share (assuming deal closes at ~$10 baseline SPAC NAV).

    • Implies 2–3× upside from entry.


    🐻 Bear Case (Downside)

    • Execution Risk:
      Scaling to logical qubits proves slower than expected. Competitors like IonQ, QuEra, Pasqal outpace Infleqtion in both qubit count and error correction.

    • Revenue Stagnation:
      Revenue growth slows, stuck at $40–60M by 2027, mainly from government R&D contracts with limited enterprise adoption.

    • SPAC Dynamics:

      • Heavy redemptions → lower net cash proceeds from CCCX merger.

      • Shares face post-de-SPAC volatility (common in quantum SPACs like Rigetti, D-Wave).

      • Market loses patience with “pre-scale” revenue model.

    • Valuation Compression:

      • Trades at 3–5× sales, similar to current Rigetti/D-Wave multiples.

      • Market cap shrinks to $500M–$800M.

    Bear Case Price Range (2026–2027):

    • $3–5/share, ~50–70% downside from SPAC baseline.


    ⚖️ Base Case (Balanced View)

    • Execution: Infleqtion successfully scales logical qubits, but timeline slips by 1–2 years.

    • Revenue: $80M–$120M by 2027, mainly government + early enterprise adoption.

    • Valuation: 6–8× forward sales, leading to a $1.5–2.5B market cap.

    Base Case Price Range (2026–2027):

    • $10–15/share (flat to modest upside from SPAC entry).


    📌 Key Takeaways

    • Bull Case → Infleqtion emerges as a top neutral-atom leader, wins defense/AI contracts, scales logical qubits → multi-bagger upside ($20–30/share).

    • Bear Case → Execution lags, competitors leap ahead, SPAC redemption crushes capital → stock fades to $3–5/share.

    • Base Case → Gradual progress, steady government revenue, limited enterprise traction → $10–15/share by 2027.

    This creates an asymmetric risk-reward profile:

    • Limited downside protection if you believe in execution (SPAC floor is thin).

    • But large upside if milestones hit, making Infleqtion one of the few quantum firms with real diversification (computing + sensing + AI).


How to express the view (purely informational—not advice)

  • CCCX common: Cleaner exposure to closing + operating catalysts; typically trades around trust pre-close (watch NAV and redemption date mechanics). spacresearch.com

  • CCCXW warrants: Higher-beta exposure if you expect strong post-close performance; note $11.50 strike and customary redemption provisions that can cap gains. Review the warrant agreement before acting. Securities and Exchange Commission


Bottom line

Infleqtion brings real products, revenue growth, and government-backed scaling plans to public markets. Pairing that with CCCX’s capital stack (trust + PIPE) and a visible milestone roadmap creates a credible quantum commercialization story—with an entry point available before the de-SPAC. For investors comfortable with SPAC mechanics and deep-tech execution risk, CCCX offers a timely, asymmetric way to underwrite Infleqtion’s next leg.


Ed Note

Today we bought some shares in the SPAC CCCX

Friday, September 5, 2025

NVE Corp (NVEC) and GlobalFoundries (GFS), complement each other for investors seeking exposure to the spintronics market.

 


here’s a simplified dual-company investment/business report on NVE Corp (NVEC) and GlobalFoundries (GFS), with emphasis on how they complement each other for retail investors seeking exposure to the spintronics market.


📊 Investment/Business Report: NVEC + GFS


🧲 NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)

Snapshot

  • Market Cap: ~$250–300M (microcap)

  • Focus: Pure-play spintronics — magnetic sensors (GMR/TMR) and digital isolators (IsoLoop®).

  • Dividend: ~$1.00/share quarterly (~6% yield).

Technology & Advances

  • Sensors: Giant/tunnel magnetoresistance (GMR/TMR) sensors for position, current, and rotation sensing.

  • Digital isolators: Patented spintronic isolators with low EMI, high speed, and radiation resistance.

  • MRAM IP: Early co-developer of MRAM; licenses IP, but does not mass-produce.

  • Recent R&D: High-reliability isolator series (IL7xxH) targeting space/aerospace designs.

Financials

  • FY2025 Revenue: ~$25.9M (down 13% YoY)

  • Net Income: ~$15M (margin ~58%)

  • Balance sheet: No debt, strong cash, high dividends.

Market & Clients 

  • End markets: Aerospace/defense, industrial automation, medical electronics.

  • Customer base: Primarily OEMs via distributors; often undisclosed due to defense/medical use.

Competitive Position

  • Moat: Specialized spintronics IP, radiation-hard reliability, and consistent profitability.

  • Competitors: Allegro, Infineon, TDK (TMR sensors); Analog Devices, Silicon Labs (digital isolators).


🏭 GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ: GFS)

Snapshot

  • Market Cap: ~$35–40B (large-cap)

  • Focus: Specialty semiconductor foundry with emphasis on automotive, IoT, RF, and embedded memories.

  • Dividend: None; reinvests in fabs and partnerships.

Technology & Advances

  • eMRAM (embedded MRAM):

    • 22FDX eMRAM already in volume production.

    • Partnered with Everspin for MRAM commercialization.

    • Supplying NXP automotive MCUs with eMRAM at 16 nm (sampling 2025).

  • Foundry role: Provides IP/processes enabling MRAM in automotive-grade, low-power chips.

  • CHIPS Act support: Benefits from U.S. and EU funding for domestic fabs.

Financials

  • Revenue (2024): ~$7B

  • Profitability: Thin margins, cyclical, but EV/EBITDA (~7.5x) suggests undervaluation vs. peers.

  • Customer base: Broad — NXP, Qualcomm, AMD (legacy), aerospace/defense contracts with U.S. DoD.

Competitive Position

  • Moat:

    • Specialty focus (not cutting-edge like TSMC, but tuned for auto/IoT).

    • Long-term contracts with automotive, defense, and government customers.

    • Scale and fabs give them first access to integrate new spintronic materials.

  • Competitors: TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel Foundry Services.


🔗 Why NVEC + GFS Together?

AttributeNVE (NVEC)GlobalFoundries (GFS)How They Complement
ScaleTiny, nicheLarge-cap, globalProvides both niche precision and mass infrastructure
FocusSpintronics IP, sensors, isolatorsEmbedded MRAM in automotive/IoTCovers both component-level devices and manufacturing platforms
ExposureDirect to spintronics fundamentalsIndirect but crucial enablerDual exposure: boutique physics + scalable foundry
FinancialsProfitable, high dividendGrowth reinvestment, undervalued multiplesIncome (NVEC) + growth/infrastructure (GFS)
Market ReachDefense, aerospace, medical nichesAutomotive, IoT, global foundry marketsBalanced coverage of high-reliability + mass-market applications

📈 Investor Takeaways

  • NVEC:

    • Best for retail investors wanting direct spintronics exposure, with income stability (6% dividend yield).

    • Niche focus makes it volatile but differentiated.

  • GFS:

    • Best for exposure to spintronics at scale (eMRAM in auto/IoT chips), backed by government support.

    • A strategic, lower-risk play on spintronics integration into mainstream semis.

Combined Strategy

  • Why own both?

    • NVEC = “pure physics boutique” → dividend income + niche exposure.

    • GFS = “infrastructure backbone” → large-cap stability + scaling of MRAM into auto/IoT.

    • Together, they give retail investors broad yet complementary exposure to spintronics’ present (NVEC) and future (GFS).


Bottom line:
For a retail investor bullish on spintronics and quantum-adjacent tech, a mini-portfolio of NVEC + GFS blends direct spintronics exposure with foundry-scale adoption. Add Everspin (MRAM) if you want higher-risk, higher-reward pure MRAM growth.

ED Note: Full disclosure

We recently bought NVEC shares and have placed GFS on watch list!

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

The Trump Administration has recently invested in both MP Materials and Intel! Question: who might be next, and why!

 


These critical U.S. companies were named in the CHIPS Act and have received preliminary agreements (Preliminary Memoranda of Terms, or PMTs)—but for which funding has not yet been fully disbursed (i.e., not finalized yet):

Ed Note:
It appears the Trump administration is turning giveaways from the chips act, into "investments" in those companies targeted. This report speculates on which companies might be next, after investments have been made in Intel and MP Materials.



1. Microchip Technology (NASDAQ: MCHP)

  • The U.S. Department of Commerce signed a non-binding Preliminary Memorandum of Terms (PMT) to provide approximately $162 million under the CHIPS and Science Act, aimed at bolstering domestic semiconductor supply for automotive, defense, and aerospace industries. That funding has not yet been finalized.
    Z2Data+10NIST+10TSMC+10

  • In a twist, Microchip later backed off pursuing the grant for expansion of its Gresham, Oregon facility. That further suggests no disbursement has occurred yet.
    KGW+1


2. Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU)

  • Micron has a preliminary agreement for a $6.1 billion CHIPS Act grant to build a chip fabrication campus in Clay, New York ("megafab") and boost capacity in Boise, Idaho.
    Chuck Schumer's Senate Website+15Wikipedia+15

  • As of now, this remains preliminary, which implies that funding has not been fully disbursed.
    Barron'sThe Verge


3. GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ: GFS)

  • In February 2024, GlobalFoundries signed a preliminary agreement for over $1.5 billion in CHIPS funding to strengthen domestic legacy chip supply.
    New York Post+1

  • The award was later finalized in November 2024—meaning the preliminary stage was completed and funding is now moving forward.
    Wikipedia


4. Intel (NASDAQ: INTC)


Summary Table

CompanyPreliminary Agreement?Finalized?Status
MicrochipYes, ~$162 M PMTNo, not finalizedFunding has not been disbursed
MicronYes, ~$6.1 B PMTNo, not finalizedStill in preliminary stage
GlobalFoundriesYes, ~$1.5 B PMTYes, finalizedFunding now moving forward
IntelYes, ~$8.5 B PMTYes, finalizedFunds now to be disbursed

Companies still in preliminary-only stage (no final disbursement yet):

  • Microchip Technology (MCHP) – ~$162 M PMT, not finalized.

  • Micron Technology (MU) – ~$6.1 B PMT, not finalized.


    Ed Note:  

  • Listen to any hints of more investments coming from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik in late September or before!

narrowing to AI tech & infrastructure and focusing on U.S.-domiciled names, here’s a balanced list of 10 companies that (a) are strategically important for American tech leadership, and (b) could see outsized upside if the U.S. government explicitly takes a position or expands incentives.


Core chip manufacturing (the foundation)

1) Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) — Leading-edge and advanced packaging fabs across AZ/OH/OR/NM; already the single biggest CHIPS Act beneficiary (grants + loans). A direct stake would further de-risk multi-node U.S. capacity and supply chain resilience. ReutersU.S. Department of Commerce

2) Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) — U.S. leader in DRAM/HBM and NAND; memory is the oxygen of AI clusters. The White House already announced a preliminary CHIPS package up to ~$6.1B for new U.S. fabs—government equity/co-investment would accelerate HBM ramp critical to training/inference. The White HouseThe Verge

3) GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ: GFS) — Only U.S. pure-play foundry at scale, trusted for DoD needs; finalized up to $1.5B CHIPS award to expand New York and modernize Vermont (incl. GaN). A government position would fortify secure domestic supply for auto/defense/edge-AI. NISTGlobalFoundries

4) Microchip Technology (NASDAQ: MCHP) — Mature-node MCUs/analog that go into everything from defense systems to data-center controls; ~$162M preliminary CHIPS support to expand U.S. fabs. Additional public backing would harden this critical “everywhere silicon” tier. NIST


AI compute & systems (where the work gets done)

5) Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ: SMCI) — Designs/racks full AI systems (GB200/NVL72, HGX B200) and leads on liquid-cooling at rack scale; a federal position signals confidence in domestic AI-server capacity and speeds deployments for gov/defense workloads. SupermicroSupermicro

6) Arista Networks (NYSE: ANET) — The Ethernet backbone for AI clusters (400/800G today, 1.6T on deck). Government support would catalyze U.S.-based networking scale-out across federal/HPC sites. Arista Networks

7) Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ: LSCC) — Ultra-low-power FPGAs for edge-AI, control, and security—ideal for ruggedized, power-constrained defense/industrial endpoints. A stake would expand “AI at the edge” capacity domestically. latticesemi.com+1


AI data-center infrastructure (power, cooling, reliability)

8) Vertiv (NYSE: VRT) — Power distribution & advanced liquid-cooling that make giga-scale AI sites possible; expanding NA solutions specifically to ease AI deployments. Federal backing would accelerate retrofits/new builds across critical facilities. Vertiv InvestorsVertiv


Materials & devices that unlock performance

9) Wolfspeed (NYSE: WOLF) — Silicon-carbide (SiC) devices and materials for efficient power (AI data centers, high-power PSUs, EV charging). Proposed $750M CHIPS support + large private capital—public co-investment would speed U.S. SiC capacity vital to AI power chains. WolfspeedSEC

10) MP Materials (NYSE: MP) — U.S. rare-earths mining/separation; DoD has already funded HREE separation at Mountain Pass. A deeper stake would cement a domestic magnet/REE supply for defense, motors, and data-center equipment.

(Recently turned into an investment in the company by the administration)  

U.S. Department of Defense


Why these 10?

  • National-security leverage: Together they span logic, memory, foundry, servers, networking, power/cooling, edge FPGAs, SiC power, and REE supply—i.e., every chokepoint between sand and AI output.

  • Policy momentum: CHIPS/DPA precedents exist (Intel, Micron, GlobalFoundries, Microchip; DoD for MP). Additional capital or a formal government position would reduce financing risk and accelerate

Saturday, August 30, 2025

Trump VS the FED - a creeping and misguided game of fiscal dominance is playing out now!

 



Famous American Humorist, Mark Twain once said: 
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes". 
Using that logic I framed this thought as a rhyme.
From my recent post on Linked in!




Thursday, August 28, 2025

BEAM Therapeutics - A simplified investor report!

 


Beam Therapeutics (NASDAQ: BEAM)

Simplified Investor Report – August 2025


1. What Beam Does

Beam is a gene-editing company that uses a next-gen technology called base editing.
Unlike traditional CRISPR, which “cuts” DNA, base editing changes single letters of DNA directly. This makes edits potentially safer and more precise.

Beam’s approach is being tested in blood diseases, liver diseases, and cancer cell therapies.


2. Current Pipeline (Key Drugs in Development)

  • BEAM-101 (Sickle Cell Disease / Beta Thalassemia)

    • Ex vivo (patient’s stem cells edited outside body).

    • Goal: Increase fetal hemoglobin to prevent sickling.

    • FDA gave RMAT designation in Aug 2025—can speed approval.

    • Competes with CRISPR Tx’s already-approved Casgevy.

  • BEAM-302 (Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, AATD – In vivo)

    • Liver-targeted using LNPs (same delivery as mRNA vaccines).

    • First clinical proof: restored missing protein in patients. Big de-risking milestone.

  • BEAM-301 (GSD-Ia, rare metabolic disease – In vivo)

    • First patients dosed in 2025. Very rare disease but clear genetic target.

  • BEAM-201 (Allogeneic CAR-T for T-cell leukemia)

    • First multiplex-edited CAR-T (4 edits in one cell).

    • Potential for “off-the-shelf” cancer treatment.

Why this matters: 

Beam is not a “one trick pony”—it has 4 very different programs in the clinic (blood, liver, metabolic, cancer). This spreads risk.


3. How Beam Compares to Other Gene Editors

CompanyTechnologyStatusNotes
Beam (BEAM)Base editing4 clinical programs (in-vivo + ex-vivo + CAR-T)Broadest pipeline; proof of editing in humans (AATD).
CRISPR Tx (CRSP)CRISPR/Cas9First FDA-approved therapy (Casgevy)First mover, but rollout is slow & complex.
Intellia (NTLA)CRISPR/Cas9ATTR program in Phase 3Closest to an in-vivo commercial therapy.
Editas (EDIT)CRISPRHb disorders in Phase 2Smaller player; similar to CRSP but later.
Verve (VERV)Base editingLDL cholesterol lowering in Phase 1Early but strong human data.
Prime Medicine (PRME)Prime editingFirst patients dosedVery early stage, but big potential.

Takeaway: Beam sits between CRSP’s proven approval and Intellia’s Phase 3 lead, but has more breadth than most others. Verve and Prime validate the editing class, but are earlier.

Ed Note:  We like all six and are currently invested in two of these names!


4. Why Analysts & Institutions Are Bullish

  • Analysts: 12–13 Buys, targets $40–80 (2–4x upside from ~$17 today).

  • Catalysts: RMAT for BEAM-101, clinical proof in BEAM-302, first patients dosed in BEAM-301.

  • Big investors buying: ARK Invest, Vanguard, Swiss National Bank, others.

  • Upside potential: If one of Beam’s in-vivo therapies works, it could transform rare disease treatment—making Beam a takeover target for big pharma.


5. Risks to Consider

  • Still pre-revenue—cash burn is high.

  • Competes against already-approved products (Casgevy in SCD).

  • In-vivo gene editing is very new—long-term safety still being proven.

  • Stock is volatile and heavily tied to trial readouts.


6. Bottom Line for Retail Investors

Beam is a high-risk, high-reward biotech.

  • It has a broad and diverse pipeline (blood, liver, rare metabolic disease, CAR-T).

  • Analysts see 2–4x upside in the next 12–24 months.

  • Beam is not yet proven commercially, but recent trial wins (esp. BEAM-302) show that base editing works in humans.

  • For investors who can tolerate volatility, Beam is one of the most exciting gene-editing plays—but it should be sized carefully in a portfolio.

Ed Note:  We are long BEAM NTLA CRSP EDIT