"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"
Showing posts with label inflation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inflation. Show all posts

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Mild stagflation or stagflation-lite is not just a possibility—it’s becoming the base case if trade tensions aren’t dialed back.

 


2025 U.S. Economic Outlook: Is Stagflation Taking Hold?

⚠️ Inflation, Slow Growth, Global Trade Friction – A Perfect Storm?

With broad tariffs, rising retaliation, and key supply chains under threat, the U.S. economy is flashing multiple stagflation warning signs.

The latest shock: a 25% tariff on autos and auto parts from Canada, Mexico, and the EU—a move that undermines decades of trade integration, especially the U.S.–Canada Auto Pact and USMCA (NAFTA 2.0).


🔥 TRADE POLICY EXPLOSION – WHO’S BEING HIT?

🌎 Major Tariff Moves (2025)

TargetKey Products TariffedRetaliation or Response
🇨🇳 ChinaEVs, batteries, solar panels, chips, steelTech import restrictions, rare earth quotas
🇪🇺 EUEVs, steel, aircraft parts, wine/luxury goodsCounter-tariffs on U.S. planes, chips, and services
🇲🇽 MexicoElectronics, car parts, agri-productsFormal WTO complaint + tariffs on grains and beef
🇨🇦 CanadaAutos, auto parts (25%), aluminum, lumber, dairyFull retaliation: U.S. food, machinery, and metals hit

🚗 Auto Pact in Crisis

  • The 1965 Auto Pact allowed free movement of vehicles and parts between the U.S. and Canada, underpinning a highly integrated North American supply chain.

  • The new 25% tariff cripples this agreement, and likely violates USMCA terms.

  • U.S. automakers face rising costs, supply shortages, and production delays.

  • Canadian and Mexican retaliation is targeting U.S. agricultural exports, manufacturing equipment, and consumer goods.


📉 MACRO SNAPSHOT – U.S. MARCH 2025

IndicatorCurrent SignalStagflation Risk?
InflationReaccelerating due to tariffs, oil
EmploymentCooling labor market⚠️
GDP GrowthSlowing (consumer + industrial)
Fed PolicyHawkish hold⚠️
Trade DisruptionHistoric—pacts and alliances shaken✅✅✅

🔍 DEEPER MACRO TRENDS

📈 Inflation Pressures

  • CPI rising toward 3.6% YoY due to:

    • Tariffs across multiple sectors

    • Supply chain congestion from EU and North America

    • Higher energy and transport costs

📉 Growth Faltering

  • Q1 GDP revised to ~0.9% annualized

  • Industrial production down

  • Auto sector especially hard-hit

  • Consumer spending under pressure from rising prices

💼 Labor Market Weakening

  • Layoffs in auto manufacturing, retail, and transport

  • Job openings declining

  • Wage growth slowing down in real terms


⚖️ THE FED’S STAGFLATION TRAP

The Fed faces a brutal dilemma:

  • Cut rates: risks fueling inflation further, especially tariff-driven.

  • Hold or hike: may choke fragile growth and deepen layoffs.

Right now, the Fed is choosing a hawkish pause, hoping inflation will ease without tipping the economy into a harder downturn.


🌐 GEOPOLITICAL AND TRADE FALLOUT

🔁 Retaliation by Allies:

  • Canada, EU, and Mexico are coordinating countermeasures.

  • Global trade dynamics reverting to fragmentation.

  • Supply chains are being reshuffled, creating inefficiencies and pricing pressure.

🚧 Risks to U.S. Exports:

  • Key U.S. sectors now under retaliatory pressure:

    • Aerospace

    • Agriculture

    • Machinery & equipment

    • Consumer packaged goods


🧭 Final Call: A Stagflationary Setup Is Forming



While not in full stagflation yet, the U.S. now faces:

  • Supply-side inflation driven by trade wars

  • Slower demand and production growth

  • Labor market stress in core sectors

⚠️ Mild stagflation or stagflation-lite is not just a possibility—it’s becoming the base case if trade tensions aren’t dialed back.

Monday, February 3, 2025

In a heated and escalating trade war with Canada, how would an export tax levied by Canada on all it's natural resources entering the USA affect American business and society

 


Below is a high-level assessment of how a hypothetical 25% or 50% Canadian export tax on all Canadian natural resources—oil, gas, metals, minerals, lumber, agricultural commodities, and even fresh water or hydro power—could affect the U.S. economy. This scenario represents a highly escalated trade conflict that would likely be unprecedented given the integrated nature of North American supply chains and the long-standing Canada-U.S. trade relationship.


1. Immediate Price and Inflation Impacts

  1. Spiking Input Costs

    • U.S. companies reliant on Canadian resources (oil, gas, uranium, metals, potash, etc.) would face significantly higher costs.
    • These cost increases would ripple through numerous industries—energy, manufacturing, construction, and agriculture—ultimately raising consumer prices.
  2. Widespread Inflationary Pressure

    • The U.S. would see broad-based inflation if major raw materials become more expensive or scarce.
    • Higher costs for fuels (gasoline, diesel, jet fuel), metals (steel, aluminum, copper), and agricultural inputs (wheat, potash fertilizer) would feed into nearly every segment of the economy.
  3. Potential “Price Shocks”

    • Resources where Canada is a top supplier (e.g., potash for fertilizer, certain heavy crude oil grades, certain rare earths) could experience short-term shortages in the U.S., causing severe price spikes until alternative sources are found (if feasible).

2. Sector-by-Sector Effects

  1. Energy Sector


    • Oil and Gas:
      • Canada is a leading oil exporter to the U.S., especially heavy crude from Alberta. A 25% or 50% export tax would sharply raise import costs for U.S. refiners.
      • Many refineries, especially along the Gulf Coast and in the Midwest, are optimized for heavier Canadian crude—switching to lighter U.S. shale or other foreign supplies is not straightforward.
      • Natural Gas: Pipeline gas from Canada serves parts of the northern U.S.; higher import costs would raise heating and industrial process costs.
    • Hydroelectric Power:

      • Certain U.S. border states import Canadian hydro power. An export tax would raise electricity costs in those regions.
  2. Metals and Minerals

    • Canada is a major source of nickel, copper, zinc, aluminum, iron ore, gold, silver, and uranium for the U.S.
    • Canada is the worlds #2 producer of Uranium (nuclear energy) and, Canada has the world's largest deposits of high-grade uranium, with grades of up to 20%, which is 100 times greater than the world average.

    • A steep export tax could disrupt U.S. manufacturing (e.g., cars, aerospace, electronics) and defense (e.g., uranium for nuclear reactors, key metals for military equipment).
    • Prices of consumer products relying on these metals (from cars to electronics) would likely increase.
       



  3. Agriculture and Food

    • Wheat, Meat, Seafood, Maple Syrup, etc.:
      • If these exports faced a 25%–50% tax, U.S. wholesalers and consumers would likely pay significantly more for Canadian wheat, beef, pork, fish, and specialty items (e.g., maple syrup and Lobster).
      • Certain regional markets in the U.S. (e.g., northern states) rely heavily on cross-border supply for fresh or specialty goods (ie: Seafood).
  4. Fertilizer (Potash)

     


    • Canada is the world’s largest producer of potash, a key fertilizer ingredient. A hefty export tax could raise costs for U.S. farmers significantly, impacting crop yields and food prices.
  5. Lumber and Forestry Products


    • Canada is a major exporter of softwood lumber and other wood products.

      A steep export tax drives up construction costs in the U.S., affecting everything from homebuilding to renovation industries.
  6. Fresh Water Exports (in bulk) Canada has 9% of worlds fresh water supply


    • While large-scale bulk water exports are minimal or highly regulated, any new tax on water or hydro resources would raise utility costs in cross-border communities.(Also fracking, as in America's shale operations, requires massive amounts of fresh water)

3. Supply Chain Disruptions and Reconfiguration (USA)

  1. Search for Alternative Suppliers

    • U.S. companies would scramble to find replacement sources—domestically or overseas—for critical inputs (heavy crude, metals, potash, lumber).
    • This process can be time-consuming and may come with higher transportation/logistics costs.
  2. Retooling and Capital Investment

    • Refiners configured for heavy Canadian crude might face expensive refitting to process lighter oil or other blends from countries like Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, or Mexico (all with their own geopolitical or supply constraints).
    • Manufacturers dependent on Canadian metals (like nickel or aluminum) might shift supply chains to other countries, though quality, reliability, and shipping costs vary.
  3. Trade and Policy Uncertainty

    • The fear of future escalations or shifting tariffs can freeze investment decisions, delaying expansion or hiring in affected sectors.
    • Multinational companies operating on both sides of the border might re-evaluate where to locate production facilities.

4. Impact on U.S. Consumers and Businesses

  1. Immediate Cost Pass-Through

    • Companies facing a sudden 25%–50% cost increase on Canadian resources will pass as much of that cost as possible onto consumers—leading to higher prices for energy, groceries, goods, and services.
  2. Potential Job Losses

    • While some U.S. resource producers might enjoy a temporary competitive edge, many businesses reliant on Canadian inputs could see profit margins squeezed or lose competitiveness (especially if they export finished goods to other markets).
    • Supply chain disruptions often lead to factory slowdowns, reduced output, and in some cases layoffs.
  3. Inflationary Pressure and Reduced Purchasing Power


    • As prices rise, American households and businesses have less disposable income to spend on non-essential goods, possibly slowing overall economic growth.

5. Geopolitical and Long-Term Consequences

  1. Severe Strain on Bilateral Relations

    • A blanket 25%–50% export tax on all Canadian resources is an extreme measure that signals a deep breakdown in trade relations. The resulting tension could spill over into defense, security, and diplomatic realms.
  2. Undermining USMCA (Formerly NAFTA)


    • This move would eviscerate the spirit of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and likely prompt complex legal battles.
    • Retaliation and counter-retaliation could spiral, damaging the integrated North American economy.
  3. Acceleration of Resource Self-Sufficiency or Alternate Sourcing

    • Over the long term, the U.S. might invest more heavily in domestic mining, energy production, or forging new trade deals with other countries.
    • Canada’s potential leverage is highest in the short to medium term, before U.S. producers scale up or alternative suppliers emerge.

Conclusion

A 25%–50% export tax on all Canadian natural resources would pose a significant economic shock to the United States:

  • Energy and industrial supply chains would face immediate cost inflation, especially for heavy crude, metals, potash, and lumber.
  • Consumers and businesses would encounter higher prices on everything from fuel and electricity to cars and groceries, fueling inflation.
  • Supply chain disruption would be severe, compelling U.S. companies to retool or seek alternative suppliers, processes that are costly and time-consuming.
  • The overall U.S. economy could face slower growth, job losses in industries reliant on Canadian inputs, and a potential inflationary spiral if retaliation escalates.

In short, while a few domestic resource producers in the U.S. might see short-term gains, the vast majority of the U.S. economy would feel pain from such a sweeping Canadian export tax—a drastic measure that signals a major breakdown in the traditionally cooperative Canada-U.S. trade relationship.

GOT GOLD?

Agnico Eagle Gold is a top 3 Gold miner on the world stage now, and, it's still growing!


GOT BOTS?