Here are great Dividend paying stocks I am considering in the event of a downturn!

Here is a breakdown of 10 excellent Canadian dividend-paying stocks, ranked by attractiveness for conservative portfolios, with all key metrics included. 

1. Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO

• Yield/Payout: 3.3–3.7%, Payout ~43–46% 

• Valuation: P/E ~13.9×; P/B ~2.0× 

• ROE: Industry standard ~12–14%

• Sharpe: ~1.1 (5‑yr)

• Pros: Big‑5 stability, dividend safety, modest valuation, strong risk-adjusted returns

• Cons: Growth tied to domestic economy; interest sensitivity

---

2. Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD.TO)

• Yield/Payout: 4.33–4.4%, Payout ~43% Valuation: P/E ~12.7×

• ROE: ~7.7% TTM (banks average higher) Sharpe: ~1.0

• Pros: High yield with strong dividend growth (12‑year streak), buyback-friendly

• Cons: Slightly lower ROE than closest peers

---

3. Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~0.9%, payout ~20–30%

• Valuation: P/E ~18–20× (rail sector)

• ROE: ~20%+

• Sharpe: ~1.0

• Pros: High efficiency, strong earnings growth, low leverage vs equity

• Cons: Minimal income component, exposure to cyclical trade volumes

---

4. Manulife Financial (MFC.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~3.8%, ~50–60% payout 

• Valuation: P/E ~10–12× typical for insurers

• ROE: Strong fiscal health (leverage ~23.9%) 

• Sharpe: Very low risk-adjusted returns

• Pros: A-rated balance sheet, 11-year dividend hikes, Asian growth engine 

• Cons: Underwhelming stock performance, sensitivity to credit/claims cycles

---

5. Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~3.66–3.7%, payout ~73%

• Valuation: P/E ~19.6×, P/B ~1.2× typical for utilities

• ROE: 7.4% 

• Sharpe: ~0.55–0.66

• Pros: 51-year dividend increase streak, low volatility, inflation hedge

• Cons: Slow growth, regulated earnings

---

6. Pembina Pipeline (PPL.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~5.3–5.5%, payout ~90% 

• Valuation: P/E ~16.8×

• ROE: ~11.6%

• Sharpe: ~0.35 (5‑yr), ~0.98 (1‑yr)

• Pros: Monthly cash flow, pipeline stability, covered dividends

• Cons: Commodity-linked cash flow; high payout

---

7. Enbridge (ENB.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~5.7%, payout ~140–142% IFF earnings 

• Valuation: P/E ~23.6×, ROE ~9.4%

• Sharpe: ~0.8

• Pros: 30-year dividend growth streak, fee-based contracts, secured backlog

• Cons: High accounting payout; exposure to regulatory, tariff risk

---

8. TC Energy (TRP.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~4.9–5.1%, payout ~88–97%

• Valuation: P/E ~16×

• ROE: ~13% (midstream avg)

• Sharpe: Moderate risk-adjusted; 1-yr ~1.5, 5-yr ~0.36

• Pros: Asset expansion in Mexico, utilities diversification

• Cons: Capital intensity; marginal earnings coverage

---

9. Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~5.6–5.9%, payout ~89% 

• Valuation: P/E ~15.5×

• ROE: ~7.9%

• Sharpe: ~0.5

• Pros: Best yield among Big‑5, international footprint

• Cons: High payout; lower profitability

---

10. BCE Inc. (BCE.TO)

• Yield/Payout: ~11–12%, payout astronomical (~600–900%+)

• Valuation: P/E ~71× trailing, forward ~10×

• ROE: ~15.5%

• Sharpe: Low due to financial leverage

• Pros: Highest yield, low beta (~0.6)

• Cons: Unsustainable high payout; reliance on debt, free cash flow issues

---

How I might use these in my Conservative Portfolio

50% Core (Stability & Yield)

• RY, TD (15% each): Diversified bank income & safety

• FTS (10%): Low-growth anchor

• CP (10%): Blue-chip growth with little volatility

• MFC (5%): Insurance diversification and balance sheet strength

30% Income Enhancers

• PPL (10%) & TRP (10%): Monthly/quarterly cash flow with pipeline leverage

• ENB (10%): Stable, price-consensus income with growth potential

15% Income Booster (Risk Aware)

• BNS (7.5%): Extra yield balancing banks

• BCE (7.5%): Ultra high yield play—only in small position, tightly monitored

5% Tactical Cash Reserve

• Hold as cash or government bonds to hedge volatility or deploy opportunistically

---

How This Works in a conservative portfolio

• Yield ~4–5%: Blended yield provides solid income with reliable coverage

• Diversification: Banks, insurers, utilities, pipelines, rail and telecom reduce correlation risk

• Valuation discipline: P/E focused on value vs growth; banks/utilities at ~12–20×, pipelines mid-teens

• Balanced volatility: Core holdings have Sharpe ~1; income enhancers moderate risk, tactical reserve cushions shocks

---

Ed Note:

Depending on Political considerations going forward, we may consider moving Enbridge up!

USA Presidential elections have a real impact on stock markets. So, How can one position oneself in the first year?

If we use the election cycle as a guide, especially for U.S. presidential elections, there are some historical patterns investors often pay attention to:

• Post-election years (like 2025) often bring policy shifts (stimulus, deregulation, defense spending, etc.) that affect certain sectors.

• The first year of a presidency often includes new government programs, spending packages, and regulatory changes—this can mean big moves for companies exposed to government contracts or regulation.

So, if we go by history and themes that often play well in post-election years, here are a few sectors and example companies to watch for potential gains in 2025:

---

⚙️ 1. Defense & Aerospace

New administrations (regardless of party) often increase defense budgets or reallocate them. Global tensions also drive this.

• Lockheed Martin (LMT)

• Northrop Grumman (NOC)

• Palantir Technologies (PLTR) – also benefits from defense + AI + government contracting.

---

🏗️ 2. Infrastructure & Clean Energy

If a new or returning president pushes for infrastructure investment or green energy, watch for this boost.

• Caterpillar (CAT) – infrastructure and construction machinery.

• NextEra Energy (NEE) – strong in renewables.

• Quanta Services (PWR) – electric grid, renewables infrastructure.

• Tesla (TSLA) – if EV incentives ramp up again.

---

🏥 3. Healthcare & Biotech

Healthcare reform efforts and FDA funding shifts can heavily impact drug and medtech companies.

• UnitedHealth Group (UNH) – strong during regulatory changes.

• Eli Lilly (LLY) and Novo Nordisk (NVO) – if focus returns to obesity and diabetes solutions.

• 10X Genomics (TXG), Twist Bioscience (TWST) – if genomics and biotech innovation get funding support.

---

🧠 4. Artificial Intelligence & Cybersecurity

Governments are investing in AI infrastructure and cybersecurity regardless of party lines.

• NVIDIA (NVDA) – chips powering AI.

• SentinelOne (S) or CrowdStrike (CRWD) – cyber defense.

• C3.ai (AI) – close to government contracts + enterprise AI.

---

💻 5. Semiconductors & Reshoring

Both parties push for U.S. manufacturing and chip independence.

• Intel (INTC) – heavy government backing for fabs.

• AMD (AMD) and Broadcom (AVGO) – tied to infrastructure and AI buildout.

---

🏦 6. Financials

Rising interest rates and policy changes may impact banks and fintechs.

• JPMorgan Chase (JPM) – strong during rising rate environments.

• Charles Schwab (SCHW) – benefits from investor optimism and capital flows.

---

🧱 Bonus: "Made in America" Manufacturing Push

If the next administration continues or accelerates reshoring, you might look at:

• Eaton (ETN) – power management.

• Generac (GNRC) – tied to grid resilience and climate-driven demand.

• Enphase Energy (ENPH) – if solar incentives return.

---

if we go purely by the Presidential Election Cycle Theory, without regard to who's elected or what policies are implemented, the stock picks would shift slightly. Here's how it breaks down:

---

🔄 Presidential Election Cycle Theory (based on 100 years of market data)

• Year 1 (Post-election, like 2025):

  • Historically the weakest year for markets, as new policies are introduced and uncertainty is high.

  • However, select sectors still do well, especially those tied to defensive industries and government spending.

---

📈 Sectors That Have Historically Done Well in Year 1 (like 2025)

1. Defense & Aerospace

   • Government spending is rarely cut here, and often increases in a new administration.

   • 📌 Picks: Lockheed Martin (LMT), Raytheon (RTX), Northrop Grumman (NOC)

2. Consumer Staples

   • Investors tend to get more defensive in Year 1, favoring essentials over risk.

   • 📌 Picks: Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP)

3. Utilities

   • Steady cash flow, dividends, and regulation-protected businesses tend to outperform early in a presidential cycle.

   • 📌 Picks: NextEra Energy (NEE), Duke Energy (DUK)

4. Healthcare

   • Historically does well early in the cycle due to defensive nature and consistent demand.

   • 📌 Picks: UnitedHealth Group (UNH), AbbVie (ABBV), Pfizer (PFE)

---

🧠 Less Emphasis on Risk-On Plays (at least early in Year 1)

High-growth sectors like tech, small caps, and speculative AI or biotech often lag in Year 1 of a presidency, unless there's a clear macro tailwind or stimulus policy. So under the pure cycle method, you might de-emphasize:

• NVIDIA (NVDA)

• Tesla (TSLA)

• ARK-style innovation stocks

---

⏳ When Would Those Growth Stocks Shine Again?

Historically, Year 3 of a presidential cycle (i.e., 2027) is the best year for markets — that’s when risk-on names historically shine again, thanks to:

• Stimulus before re-election campaigns

• Low volatility

• Business-friendly environments

---

Summary of 2025 Sector Tilt (Based on 100-Year Cycle Alone):

Sector	Reason	Example Stocks
Defense	New spending priorities, safe in all climates	LMT, RTX, NOC
Consumer Staples	Defensive, reliable earnings	PG, KO, PEP
Utilities	High dividends, stable cash flow	NEE, DUK
Healthcare	Consistent demand, defensive	UNH, ABBV, PFE

---

Let’s blend the Presidential Election Cycle theory with the reality of today’s innovation drivers: AI, quantum computing, and healthcare.

🧠 The Strategy:

• Use the Year 1 (2025) cycle pattern as the foundation (defensives and government-aligned picks).

• Overlay that with 2025’s megatrends — AI, quantum computing, and healthcare innovation.

• Choose balanced exposure: stability + growth + innovation, weighted accordingly.

---

📊 Hypothetical 2025 Portfolio (Balanced & Thematic)

Category	Weight	Stock Picks	Rationale
Defense & Government AI	20%	Lockheed Martin (LMT) Palantir Technologies (PLTR)	Defense always gets funding in Year 1. PLTR has deep AI + Gov roots.
Consumer Staples	10%	Procter & Gamble (PG) PepsiCo (PEP)	Safe haven during economic/policy transitions.
Utilities (Green Tilt)	10%	NextEra Energy (NEE) Brookfield Renewable (BEP)	Stable dividends + clean energy upside.
Healthcare (Core)	20%	UnitedHealth (UNH) Eli Lilly (LLY)	Defensive and growth. LLY also has GLP-1 tailwind.
Healthcare (Innovative)	10%	10X Genomics (TXG) Twist Bioscience (TWST)	Genomics and synthetic biology play to long-term innovation.
AI Infrastructure (Stable)	10%	Microsoft (MSFT) NVIDIA (NVDA)	MSFT for enterprise AI/cloud, NVDA for infrastructure. Both resilient even in choppy years.
AI + Quantum Pure Plays	10%	C3.ai (AI) IonQ (IONQ)	Riskier growth, but aligned with megatrend of the decade.
Cash or Short-term Bonds	10%	BIL (Treasury ETF) or cash equivalent	Preserves dry powder for volatility and rotation into growth later in the cycle.

---

🧩 Optional Tilt Ideas (if you want more flavor)

• Swap PEP for Costco (COST) if you want retail exposure.

• Add AbbVie (ABBV) if you want more dividend-friendly healthcare.

• Add Honeywell (HON) for a hybrid industrial + quantum exposure.

---

🎯 Portfolio Themes Summary:

• Cycle-aware: Defensive posture in Year 1.

• Future-aware: Allocated to the sectors leading the next wave (AI, quantum, genomics).

• Balanced: Risk is spread across stability (utilities/staples), income (healthcare/defense), and innovation (AI/quantum/genomics).

Now let’s bolt on a “high-risk / high-reward” satellite portfolio that complements your core 2025 cycle-aware + future-tech portfolio.

🎯 Purpose of Satellite Portfolio:

• Capture explosive upside potential from early-stage or volatile innovators.

• Lean into speculative AI, quantum, biotech, and frontier tech bets.

• Accept that some may not perform in Year 1 of the cycle, but could 10x+ in later years.

---

🚀 Speculative Satellite Portfolio (10-15% of Total Portfolio)

Stock / Ticker	Sector	Rationale
C3.ai (AI)	AI Enterprise	Early mover in AI platforms, volatile but visionary — Gov + private AI.
IonQ (IONQ)	Quantum Tech	One of the few pure-play quantum stocks, backed by AWS/Microsoft.
Recursion Pharma (RXRX)	AI + Drug Discovery	Backed by NVIDIA + using AI to map biology and accelerate pharma pipelines.
Annovis Bio (ANVS)	Alzheimer’s Biotech	Small-cap biotech chasing a huge unmet need — big swing on clinical data.
Symbotic (SYM)	Robotics/AI	AI-powered warehouse robotics, backed by Walmart and SoftBank.
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG)	Biotech/Genomics	Access to early-stage genomics, CRISPR, and longevity companies.
BrainChip Holdings (BRCHF)	Neuromorphic AI	Super speculative — building chips modeled after the human brain.
Zapata AI (ZPTA)	Quantum-AI	Recent SPAC; combining generative AI with quantum optimization. Very high-risk.

---

⚠️ Notes:

• These stocks/companies are more volatile and often not profitable.

• Some may be thinly traded or prone to sharp corrections on news.

• Meant to be a smaller piece (10-15%) of your total exposure — think moonshots.

---

🔧 Allocation Suggestion (If you allocate 15%)

Ticker	Allocation %
AI	2%
IONQ	2%
RXRX	2%
ANVS	2%
SYM	2%
ARKG	2%
BRCHF	1.5%
ZPTA	1.5%

---

ED Note:

This is not investment advice, nor am I an investment advisor. The foregoing is a report created wholly using "Deep Research" Ai using public information from 100 years of Presidential elections. It should be noted, however, that many of Wall Streets elite often refer to the "Election Cycle" metric.

Risk Level	Catalyst to Watch	Entry Price Target ($)	Stop-Loss Level ($)
High	New enterprise AI contracts, earnings growth	27.0	20.0
High	Government contracts, quantum computing adoption	10.0	7.0
High	Partnerships with pharma, AI platform development	7.0	5.0

STEM Inc. is facing a challenging period, marked by significant revenue declines and strategic adjustments, however, there is real optimism going forward in the energy storage market!

 

In the first quarter of 2024, STEM Inc. reported a 62% year-over-year decrease in revenue, primarily due to a $33 million reduction in revenue from previous periods​ (Stem Investors)​​ (Stem Investors)​. This decline has impacted their gross profit and increased their net loss to $72.3 million compared to $44.8 million in the same quarter of the previous year​ (Stem Investors)​.

Despite these challenges, STEM Inc. has taken steps to improve profitability and focus on higher-margin opportunities. The company has proactively cancelled lower-margin contracts, which has resulted in a reduced backlog but is aimed at improving the overall profitability profile of the company​ (Stem Investors)​. Additionally, STEM has launched new software solutions like the PowerTrack Asset Performance Management suite and Athena PowerBidder Pro, which have been well-received in the market and are expected to drive future growth​ (Stem)​​ (Investing.com)​.

Financially, STEM Inc. has a stable cash position, with $112.8 million in cash and short-term investments at the end of the first quarter of 2024. The company also expects to achieve positive EBITDA for the full year 2024, driven by improved gross margins and cost control measures​ (Stem Investors)​.

There is no specific information about suitors for STEM Inc. at this time. However, the company continues to build strategic partnerships and expand its market presence, which could make it an attractive target in the future​ (Stem)​.

Overall, STEM Inc. is working through its financial difficulties by focusing on higher-margin projects and expanding its innovative software offerings, which may position it for future growth and potential acquisition interest.

STEM Inc. is in a position where several companies could potentially benefit from a merger, particularly those looking to enhance their capabilities in AI-driven clean energy solutions, energy storage, and renewable energy management.

1. Large Energy Storage and Management Companies: Companies like Fluence and Wartsila, which are heavily involved in large-scale energy storage solutions, could benefit from acquiring STEM Inc. These companies could leverage STEM’s AI-driven software platform, Athena, to optimize their energy storage assets and enhance their software capabilities​ (markets.businessinsider.com)​​ (Energy-Storage.News)​.

2. Renewable Energy Firms: Renewable energy developers such as NextEra Energy and Enel Green Power might find value in merging with STEM Inc. These firms could integrate STEM’s advanced software solutions to optimize the performance and management of their extensive solar and wind portfolios. This would allow them to enhance their operational efficiency and maximize returns on their renewable energy investments​ (Energy-Storage.News)​​ (Stem Investors)​.

3. Utility Companies: Major utilities that are expanding their renewable energy and storage projects, such as Duke Energy and Dominion Energy, could also benefit. By incorporating STEM’s technologies, these utilities could improve grid management and reliability, and better integrate distributed energy resources into their systems​ (markets.businessinsider.com)​​ (Stock Analysis)​.

4. Technology Firms with Clean Energy Focus: Companies like Alphabet (Google) and Amazon, which have significant investments in renewable energy to power their operations, could use STEM’s AI-driven solutions to further optimize their energy usage and enhance sustainability efforts. These technology giants are always looking for innovative solutions to reduce their carbon footprints and improve energy efficiency​ (Energy-Storage.News)​​ (Stem Investors)​.

Potential suitors would not only gain access to STEM’s innovative technology but also benefit from its strong market position and customer base, thereby enhancing their own offerings and competitive edge in the rapidly growing clean energy sector.

The companies best positioned to benefit from a merger with STEM Inc. (STEM) are likely to be large energy storage and management companies, renewable energy firms, and utility companies. Specifically:

1. Fluence:

   • Strategic Fit: Fluence, a leading global energy storage technology and services provider, would benefit significantly from STEM’s AI-driven software platform, Athena, which optimizes energy storage assets. This integration could enhance Fluence’s offerings in energy storage solutions.
   • Market Position: Fluence’s focus on large-scale energy storage projects aligns well with STEM’s technology and market segment​ (markets.businessinsider.com)​​ (Energy-Storage.News)​.

2. NextEra Energy:

   • Renewable Energy Expertise: NextEra Energy, one of the largest renewable energy producers, would benefit from STEM’s software solutions to manage and optimize its extensive portfolio of solar and wind projects. This would enhance operational efficiency and financial returns.
   • Sustainability Goals: NextEra’s commitment to sustainability and clean energy makes STEM’s technology a strategic addition to its capabilities​ (Energy-Storage.News)​​ (Stock Analysis)​.

3. Duke Energy:

   • Utility Integration: Duke Energy, with its focus on expanding renewable energy and storage projects, could leverage STEM’s AI-driven technologies to improve grid management, reliability, and integration of distributed energy resources.
   • Regulatory Compliance: The merger would also help Duke Energy meet regulatory mandates for energy storage and renewable integration more effectively​ (markets.businessinsider.com)​​ (Stem Investors)​.

These companies are well-positioned to integrate STEM’s innovative technology into their existing operations, providing immediate benefits in terms of enhanced efficiency, better asset management, and improved financial performance. 

The strategic alignment of STEM’s AI-driven solutions with these companies' goals and market positions makes them ideal candidates for benefiting from such a merger.

Best bet

A strong argument can be made for Fluence Energy to consider merging with STEM Inc.

We can examine several strategic, operational, and financial factors. Here's a detailed breakdown of the potential advantages and considerations:

Strategic Alignment

1. Complementary Business Models:

   • Fluence Energy specializes in energy storage and digital applications for renewable energy.
   • STEM Inc. provides AI-driven energy storage solutions and energy management systems.
   • Combining these capabilities could create a comprehensive energy storage and management powerhouse, offering end-to-end solutions.

2. Market Expansion:

   • A merger could enable both companies to expand their market reach and customer base, leveraging each other's existing networks and market presence.

3. Technology Synergies:

   • Integrating STEM's AI-driven platform with Fluence's energy storage technology could enhance product offerings, making the combined entity a leader in smart energy solutions.

Operational Efficiency

1. Cost Savings:

   • Potential for operational efficiencies and cost savings through the consolidation of R&D, administrative functions, and supply chain operations.
   • Economies of scale could reduce production costs and improve margins.

2. Enhanced Innovation:

   • A merger could facilitate better resource allocation towards innovation, accelerating the development of advanced energy solutions and potentially leading to breakthroughs in energy management technology.

Financial Considerations

1. Revenue Growth:

   • The combined entity could see significant revenue growth through cross-selling opportunities and expanding service offerings to existing customers.

2. Market Valuation:

   • A larger, more diversified company might command a higher market valuation, making it more attractive to investors and better positioned to raise capital for future growth.

3. Cost of Capital:

   • Improved financial stability and market positioning could potentially lower the cost of capital, providing more funds for investment in strategic initiatives.

Competitive Advantage

1. Stronger Competitive Position:

   • The merger could create a stronger competitor in the energy storage and management sector, capable of competing more effectively against other large players.

2. Enhanced Customer Value Proposition:

   • By offering a more comprehensive suite of solutions, the combined company could provide greater value to customers, increasing customer loyalty and market share.

Potential Challenges

1. Integration Risks:

   • Mergers often face integration challenges, including aligning corporate cultures, integrating technology platforms, and retaining key talent.
   • Effective change management and clear communication strategies would be essential to mitigate these risks.

2. Regulatory Considerations:

   • Regulatory approval processes can be complex and time-consuming. Both companies would need to navigate these processes carefully to avoid potential delays or obstacles.

3. Market Reaction:

   • The market's reaction to the merger would need to be managed carefully. Clear communication of the merger's strategic benefits would be crucial to gain investor support.

Conclusion

A strong argument can be made for Fluence Energy to consider merging with STEM Inc., based on the strategic alignment, operational efficiencies, financial benefits, and enhanced competitive position. However, it is essential to carefully evaluate and address potential challenges, particularly regarding integration and regulatory hurdles, to ensure a successful merger.