"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"
Showing posts with label penny stocks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label penny stocks. Show all posts

Monday, March 24, 2025

Been adding to CABA Bio stock this month. Here's why!

 


Ed Note:

We often like to say that, some penny stocks should not be overlooked just because they are pennystocks.

CABA is one of those (We usually keep these acquisitions to 1-2% of portfolio)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (ticker: CABA) 

is a clinical-stage biotechnology company dedicated to developing targeted cell therapies for autoimmune diseases. Their leading candidate, resecabtagene autoleucel (rese-cel), is an investigational CD19-CAR T cell therapy aimed at treating conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, systemic sclerosis, and generalized myasthenia gravis.

In their third-quarter 2024 financial report, Cabaletta Bio disclosed research and development expenses of $26.3 million and general and administrative expenses of $6.8 million. As of September 30, 2024, the company held $183.0 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, projecting sufficient funds to support operations into the first half of 2026.TipRanks

Recent clinical updates have shown promising outcomes for rese-cel. In February 2025, Cabaletta Bio reported that among the first 10 patients treated across various autoimmune indications, 90% experienced either no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or only grade 1 (fever) CRS, and 90% had no instances of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Additionally, deep B cell depletion was observed in all patients post-treatment, with B cell repopulation typically commencing around two months after infusion.Yahoo Finance

As of March 24, 2025, Cabaletta Bio's stock is trading at $1.70 per share, reflecting a slight decrease from the previous close. The stock has experienced significant volatility over the past year, with a 52-week range between $1.71 and $24.67.Barron's

The company's strategic priorities for 2025 include aligning with the FDA on registrational trial designs for rese-cel, enrolling and dosing patients across multiple disease-specific cohorts in the RESET clinical development program, and advancing innovations to enhance patient access and experience.GlobeNewswire

While Cabaletta Bio has demonstrated encouraging clinical progress, its viability and future prospects are contingent upon continued successful trial outcomes, regulatory approvals, and effective commercialization strategies. Investors should consider the inherent risks associated with investing in clinical-stage biotechnology firms, including potential delays or failures in clinical development and regulatory processes.Yahoo Finance

Cabaletta Bio (CABA) could be a viable takeover target for several reasons, particularly for larger biotech or pharmaceutical companies looking to expand their autoimmune disease portfolios or cell therapy platforms. Here's an analysis of its viability as a target and potential suitors:


🔍 Why CABA Might Be a Takeover Target

  1. Differentiated Platform (CARTA™):
    Cabaletta’s use of CAR-T for autoimmune diseases sets it apart. While CAR-T has been primarily used in oncology, Cabaletta is applying it to autoimmunity, a space with high unmet needs and blockbuster potential.

  2. Positive Early Clinical Data:
    The early data on rese-cel (CD19-CAR-T) has shown promising safety and efficacy signals in lupus, myositis, systemic sclerosis, and myasthenia gravis—all large markets with limited curative options.

  3. Strong Cash Position:
    With ~$183 million in cash as of Q3 2024 and a relatively low burn rate, Cabaletta can fund operations into H1 2026. This gives a buyer a de-risked financial runway.

  4. Small Market Cap:
    Trading under $2 per share with a market cap significantly lower than biotech peers in autoimmune cell therapy, CABA is affordable for many potential acquirers, especially in a consolidating market.


🤝 Who Might Be Interested in Acquiring CABA?

🧬 1. Roche / Genentech

  • Deep expertise in autoimmune and immunology, including rituximab and Actemra.

  • Has shown interest in next-gen B-cell targeting and CAR-T beyond oncology.

  • CABA’s lupus and MS targets align well with Roche’s immunology strategy.

💉 2. Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS)

  • Invested heavily in CAR-T through Abecma and Breyanzi.

  • Recently expanded into autoimmune disorders (e.g., Zeposia for MS).

  • CABA would complement both their cell therapy and autoimmune portfolio.

🧪 3. Novartis

  • Owns Kymriah (a CAR-T therapy) and has experience navigating the cell therapy regulatory path.

  • Could apply its global scale and manufacturing capabilities to CABA’s autoimmune-focused pipeline.

🧬 4. Johnson & Johnson (Janssen)

  • Aggressively expanding in autoimmune and rare diseases.

  • Partnered in the past with Legend Biotech for CAR-T in cancer (Carvykti).

  • Could see CABA as a way to enter autoimmune CAR-T leadership.

🧫 5. Gilead Sciences / Kite Pharma

  • Pioneer in CAR-T with Yescarta, but with limited non-oncology pipeline.

  • May seek diversification via autoimmune applications to sustain long-term CAR-T returns.

🧠 6. Biogen

  • Recently active in neurology and autoimmune (e.g., MS drugs).

  • Could see CABA as an entry into cell therapy for neuro-autoimmune conditions like myasthenia gravis.


📉 What Could Hold Back a Takeover?

  • Still early-stage: Most candidates are in Phase 1 or early Phase 2.

  • Manufacturing complexities: CAR-T therapy production and delivery are resource-intensive.

  • Regulatory risk: Applying CAR-T to autoimmune disease is relatively new, so approval pathways are less defined.


🧭 Summary

Cabaletta Bio is a compelling acquisition target in a growing niche—cell therapy for autoimmune diseases. Its unique platform, strong early data, and relatively low valuation make it attractive to major players in biotech and pharma, particularly those with an existing CAR-T infrastructure or autoimmune drug pipeline.

Related Articles:

Will the New developments from Cabaletto Bio (CABA) make it a takeover target? Stay tuned!



Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Who might be interested in Acquiring Chargepoint's EV charging network?

 Feb 11th 2025

We have been "Stopped out" of Chargepoint shares.

O U C H !!! Sometimes speculation can hurt! (even if it's just 1% of your portfolio)

However, the article remains to see what happens. CHPT moved to our watch list for now!


This articles is speculative as, there’s no concrete evidence or official announcement that ChargePoint is on the block or that any particular company has definitive plans to buy them

With that said, here’s how one might reason about who could be most interested and best positioned to acquire ChargePoint:


1. BP

  • Why BP?

    • BP has already made several moves in EV charging—e.g., acquiring Chargemaster (now BP Pulse) in the U.K. and AMPLY Power in the U.S.
    • They have a strategic objective to diversify into lower-carbon businesses.
    • Synergies: BP can integrate ChargePoint’s network and technology with its vast global fuel retail footprint, particularly in North America where ChargePoint is strong.
  • Why It Makes Sense

    • Instant Scale: ChargePoint’s extensive network would give BP an immediate, top-tier presence in the U.S. EV charging market.
    • Shareholder Pressure: As BP transitions to an “integrated energy company,” a big EV charging acquisition is a visible commitment to that strategy.

2. Shell

  • Why Shell?

    • Shell has been aggressive in the clean energy and EV charging space, acquiring companies like Greenlots in the U.S. and Ubitricity in Europe.
    • Shell’s gas station network and convenience retail model could seamlessly add another major EV charging brand to its portfolio.
  • Why It Makes Sense

    • Global Reach: Shell operates in nearly every corner of the globe, so acquiring ChargePoint would bolster Shell’s expansion of EV charging stations in North America—and potentially integrate ChargePoint hardware/software in other regions.
    • Proven Track Record: Shell has demonstrated it’s willing to buy established charging companies rather than build from scratch.

3. Chevron

  • Why Chevron?

    • Chevron is somewhat late to the EV charging race compared to BP and Shell. It made smaller-scale moves (e.g., partnering with EVgo), but not a blockbuster acquisition yet.
    • If Chevron wants to catch up fast, ChargePoint—with hardware, software, and thousands of locations—would be a big leap forward.
  • Why It Makes Sense

    • Competitive Response: With BP and Shell scaling in EV charging, Chevron might not want to be left behind in the future fueling landscape.
    • U.S. Focus: ChargePoint’s largest market is the U.S., which aligns well with Chevron’s strong North American presence.

4. TotalEnergies

  • Why TotalEnergies?

    • TotalEnergies (formerly Total) is actively investing in renewables and EV charging across Europe. They’ve acquired several smaller charging players and are building out networks in France and beyond.
    • They could see ChargePoint as a chance to expand rapidly in North America—an area they’re not as strong in yet compared to Europe.
  • Why It Makes Sense

    • Diversification: TotalEnergies is rebranding itself as a broad-based energy company. Picking up a major EV charging firm like ChargePoint would bolster that identity.
    • Technology & Software: ChargePoint’s robust cloud-based software platform could be integrated globally with TotalEnergies’ existing networks.

5. Large Utilities or Conglomerates

  • Potential Players: NextEra Energy, Iberdrola, Engie, E.ON, or even Berkshire Hathaway (through its energy subsidiary).
  • Why a Utility?
    • Utilities have a natural link to EV charging—electricity supply is their core business, and installing chargers helps grow their load and services.
  • Why It Makes Sense
    • Grid Integration Expertise: Utilities already manage power distribution, so owning a charging network offers potential vertical integration.
    • Regulatory & Infrastructure Experience: Utilities are used to capital-intensive projects and have relationships with regulators, helping to streamline infrastructure deployment.

6. An Automotive or Tech Giant

  • Potential Players: GM, Ford, or even Amazon.
  • Note: Chargepoint recently partnered with GM to extend their EV charging network)
  • Why an OEM or Tech Firm?
    • GM and Ford (and other automakers) have partnered with third-party charging networks but haven’t outright purchased one of the largest networks.
    • Amazon might be interested in EV charging for its delivery fleet and consumer ecosystem.
  • Why It Makes Sense
    • Vertical Integration: Automakers are increasingly looking to control more of the EV value chain—battery supply, software, and charging infrastructure.
    • Ecosystem Play: A tech giant could bundle EV charging with other services (e.g., Amazon’s logistics and retail ecosystem).

The “Best Positioned” Takeaway

  • BP and Shell arguably have the most well-defined strategies and track records in the EV charging space among oil majors, making them the likeliest candidates if a deal were ever to materialize.
  • Chevron or TotalEnergies might be a close second if they decide to leapfrog organically building a U.S. network.
  • Utilities or Tech Giants could be surprise acquirers, but they’d have to justify an acquisition of ChargePoint’s scale and align it with their core business models.

In the end, any prospective buyer would be looking for:

  1. Immediate Scale and Network: ChargePoint is one of the largest EV charging networks, particularly in North America.
  2. Brand and Technology: ChargePoint’s software, hardware, and partnerships (with businesses, municipalities, and fleets) would save an acquirer years of development time.
  3. Strategic Fit: Whether it’s an oil major pivoting to renewables, a utility expanding its electric footprint, or an OEM/tech giant securing charging for its customers, each potential acquirer must see a clear path to synergy and long-term ROI.

Again, all of this is speculative—but from a strategic standpoint, BP or Shell are commonly viewed as the most logical suitors if (and it’s a big “if”) ChargePoint were ever up for sale.

ED Note: Full Disclosure

We have been accumulating CHPT shares!


Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Investor John Templeton got his start in penny stocks. Here are some large companies that were once pennystocks!

Let’s explore how some of these tech giants 

and other companies were once penny stocks:



  1. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL): Apple, founded in 1976, had its ups and downs. With nine stock splits taken into account, it was in penny stock territory as recently as 1995. Now, it trades above $300 a share1.
  1. Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F): Ford, a Fortune 500 company, was also once a penny stock. It has come a long way since then2.
  1. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN): Believe it or not, Amazon was once a penny stock too. Its remarkable growth turned it into the e-commerce giant we know today3.
  1. Google (now Alphabet): Google (now part of Alphabet) started as a penny stock when it went public in 2004. Its search engine dominance and expansion into various tech sectors transformed it into a powerhouse1.
  1. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT): Microsoft, with its stock splits considered, was in penny stock territory until the mid-1990s. It has since become one of the world’s most valuable companies1.

These transformations demonstrate the potential for substantial growth

even from humble beginnings!


As an interesting side note, in 1998 when Amazon was still in it's infancy, Jeff Bezos was not a multi billionaire. 

However, he saw a company that he believed had a vision for the future.  He invested $250,000 (a large sum for him at the time) into that company. That company was Google!

Bezos turned that modest $250,000 investment into $7.9 billion 

a 3 million percent-plus return



Here are five more companies that were once penny stocks that have achieved significant success:


  1. Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI): Sirius XM, one of the world’s biggest audio and communication companies, was once a penny stock trading at only $0.60 about 10 years ago. It has since grown over 965% and expanded its reach with the addition of Pandora Radio1.
  1. Accelerate Diagnostics Inc. (AXDX): Focused on solving antibiotic resistance challenges, Accelerate Diagnostics has seen substantial growth. Its stock was once considered a very small penny stock but has risen significantly since then1.

Remember, investing in penny stocks can be risky, but these examples show that with the right catalysts and timing, substantial growth is possible! 


Are there hidden gems in today's crop of penny stocks with new technology?

We currently own shares in these Microcap companies!

DNA RXRX IONQ QBTS OUST AEVA WONDR CHPT ADPT OPEN EDIT CRSP STEM PLUG 

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

MIT performance report supports Beryllium Nuclear Fuel and SiC fuel technology


Published Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:05 am
VANCOUVER, BC – July 9th, 2013 – IBC Advanced Alloys Corp. (TSX-V: IB; OTCQX: IAALF) (“IBC” or the “Company”) reports that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) has completed its initial review and delivered a fuel performance report validating the feasibility of IBC’s patented beryllium oxide (“BeO”) nuclear fuel technology combined with Ceramic Tubular Products, LLC (“CTP”) silicon carbide cladding. As reported in June 2012, IBC entered into a sponsored research agreement with MIT to analyze the performance of the BeO enhanced fuel and how it would perform with the addition of silicon carbide ("SiC) cladding.
IBC’s partnerships with CTP and MIT regarding a SiC based ceramic composite cladding complement IBC’s ongoing nuclear fuel R&D being conducted at Purdue and Texas A&M universities. The fuel performance report validates the characteristics of the fuel technology and further demonstrates how IBC’s BeO enhanced fuel, combined with CTP’s SiC cladding, could result in reduced fuel operating temperature and improve fuel operating characteristics leading to a safer and more accident tolerant fuel.
As a result of recent events in the nuclear industry, especially the well known issues at Fukushima in 2011, industry officials and governments are developing alternative strategies and increasingly reviewing the safety benefits of accident tolerant fuels. Because of this increasing industry awareness, the Company is in discussions with a number of potential nuclear industry partners, including Japanese fuel cycle suppliers, to explore and discuss the next phase of R&D including irradiation requirements and testing of the fuel in test reactors.
“We are very encouraged with the conclusions of the MIT fuel performance report about the beneficial characteristics and capability of the enhanced BeO fuel in combination with the SiC cladding technology”, said Jim Malone, IBC’s Vice President of Nuclear Fuel. “IBC is working diligently with Purdue, Texas A&M, CTP and and other industry participants to take the next step of a full irradiation trial in a test reactor to further understand and evaluate the advantages of BeO enhanced fuel as a next generation accident tolerant fuel.”
The IBC sponsored research at MIT is led by Dr. Mujid Kazimi, the MIT Tokyo Electric Power Company (“TEPCO”) Professor in Nuclear Engineering. Dr. Kazimi is also an MIT Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (“CANES”). Dr. Kazimi is an expert on fuel performance, safety and power density with a substantial body of peer-reviewed publications as well as numerous academic awards and nuclear industry honors. In addition to his MIT responsibilities, Dr. Kazimi is also a member of the Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee at the US Department of Energy.
As previously reported, IBC has extended its research agreements with Purdue and Texas A&M, to advance its BeO nuclear fuels R&D until December 2013. IBC’s nuclear fuel program is focused on developing an accident tolerant high thermal conductivity BeO nuclear fuel for both current and future nuclear power reactors that is more efficient and safer than existing nuclear fuels. The project’s objective is to commercialize the intellectual property and to position IBC as an essential part of the nuclear industry’s supply chain.
About IBC Advanced Alloys Corp.
IBC is an integrated manufacturer and distributor of rare metals (beryllium) based alloys and related products serving a variety of sectors including aerospace, automotive, telecommunications and a range of industrial applications. IBC has 86 employees and production facilities in Indiana, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Missouri. IBC is creating a dynamic global advanced alloys company. IBC’s common shares are traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “IB” and the OTCQX under the symbol “IAALF”.
IBC Advanced Alloys Corp.
Ian Tootill, Director of Corporate Communications
(604) 685-6263 ext 110
Email: itootill@ibcadvancedalloys.com