"Patience is a Super Power" - "The Money is in the waiting"

Thursday, August 14, 2025

What is the overall value of Ucore Rare Metals if suitors (such as MP Materials) come looking?

 


Short answer: a defensible sum-of-the-parts range today is roughly US$0.7B–US$1.1B,

with very large upside if REE prices re-rate or if LA-SMC reaches full scale on robust offtakes.

How I get there (quick SOTP)

  • Bokan–Dotson Ridge (Alaska) — “in-ground”/contained oxide value (GMV):

    • The 2013 NI-43-101 PEA plans ~20,104 t of recovered REO over 11 years (incl. ~889 t Dy₂O₃ and 133 t Tb₂O₃). Using current spot/average oxide prices (USGS 2024 averages for Nd/Dy/Tb and Metal.com for others), that contained basket is about US$0.65B; using the new DoD-anchored Nd/Pr floor price of $110/kg raises it to ~US$0.80–0.85B. ucore.com+1U.S. Geological SurveyMetal.com+2Metal.com+2

    • For context only, the original PEA (using 2009–2012 price deck) showed post-tax NPV10 ≈ US$368M and pre-tax NPV10 ≈ US$577M; that price deck implied a GMV ≈ US$2.55B, far higher than today’s market. ucore.com

  • LA-SMC (Alexandria, Louisiana) — strategic separations facility:


    • Capacity plan: 2,000 t/y TREO in 2026 → 5,000 t/y in 2027 → 7,500 t/y targeted for 2028.

    • Capital & support: Phase-1 CAPEX ~US$50M plus ~US$30M commissioning feedstock; Louisiana’s incentive package totals ~US$15M; U.S. DoD funding includes US$4M (demo) and US$18.4M (scale-up Phase 2). On a replacement-cost/strategic-scarcity basis that supports a US$75–US$225M facility value today (before signed long-term offtakes). ucore.com+2ucore.com+2Metal Tech News

  • Strategic backdrop (why the premium): the DoD’s recent actions (e.g., a U.S. NdPr floor of ~$110/kg) and ex-China premiums for magnet materials improve the economics of non-China supply chains—directly supporting the case for domestic separation plants like LA-SMC. Barron'sMetal.comReuters

Putting it together (range logic)

  • Low case (today’s prices & cautious plant value): Bokan GMV ~US$0.65B + LA-SMC US$0.075B~US$0.73B. U.S. Geological SurveyMetal.com

  • Base case (DoD Nd/Pr floor & mid plant value): Bokan GMV ~US$0.80–0.85B + LA-SMC US$0.15–0.20B~US$0.95B–US$1.05B. Metal.comBarron's

  • High case (faster ramp/strong premiums): Bokan at higher basket prices + LA-SMC at the top of replacement/strategic range ⇒ ~US$1.1B+ (and much more only if prices revisit 2010–12 levels). ucore.com

Important caveats

  • GMV ≠ mine value. It ignores operating costs, sustaining capex, taxes, recoveries, and timing. The PEA’s post-tax NPV10 ≈ US$368M (2012 prices) is the best apples-to-apples project-economic anchor until Ucore files an updated study. ucore.com

  • LA-SMC’s value hinges on execution: feedstock contracts, customer offtakes, and realized separation margins (non-China margins are historically slim without policy support). Reuters

If I put myself in MP Materials’ boardroom shoes and treat Ucore as a strategic acquisition (not just a discounted DCF buy), the “top price” would hinge on three intertwined drivers:

  1. Strategic value premium – locking down U.S.-controlled heavy rare earths (Dy, Tb) and a separation plant in Louisiana, which MP currently lacks in that scale outside its own Mountain Pass light REO focus.

  2. Replacement cost vs. scarcity – it’s not just “what’s it worth now,” but “what would it cost and how long would it take to replicate?” The answer is 7–10 years for a comparable HREE mine, and 3–5 years for a fully permitted and funded separation facility.

  3. Synergy value – LA-SMC could run today on MP’s Mountain Pass feedstock or third-party contracts, and Bokan could feed MP’s magnet material output in later years.


Offer math from MP’s POV

We can run this two ways:

A. Pure project economics + modest premium (conservative)

  • Base-case intrinsic (NPV10 for Bokan + LA-SMC PV) = ~US$450–550M.

  • Add 30–40% control premium typical in mining M&A.

  • Indicative “top” = ~US$600–750M.

B. Strategic scarcity + policy premium (aggressive)

  • Start from Bokan in-ground basket value (~US$0.80–0.85B) + LA-SMC strategic value (~US$150–200M).

  • Apply a 15–25% premium for time advantage and geopolitical insurance (MP secures domestic HREEs, keeps them from competitors like Lynas or Energy Fuels).

  • Indicative “top” = ~US$1.05–1.15B.


Where MP would likely settle

Realistically, MP would probably aim below $1B unless:

  • HREE prices spike (Dy, Tb, Nd/Pr all ↑ 30–50%+),

  • or competing bidders (Lynas, Energy Fuels, or a defense-backed fund) enter the room.

Given current market conditions, I think MP’s walk-away ceiling might be ~US$900M–950M, but they’d start a bid much lower, possibly in the $500–600M range to test Ucore’s resolve.


1. Ucore's Current Market Price

Let's work with the OTC price of US$2.02, since MP Materials would most likely deal in U.S. dollars via a U.S.-focused acquisition transaction.


2. Ucore’s Current Market Capitalization

Using the OTC price:


3. Estimated “Top Price” Offer Value

From our earlier discussion, the “top price” offer from MP Materials could realistically range between US$900 million and US$1.15 billion, depending on strategic synergies, execution risk, and market conditions.


4. Calculating the Premium Over Market Value

To find the implied premium:

Offer Price (USD)Implied Premium Over Market Cap
US$900 million= (900 ÷ 189 – 1) ≈ +376%
US$1.05 billion+456%
US$1.15 billion+509%

So, MP Materials would be paying roughly 3.8× to over 5× the current market capitalization of Ucore.


5. Context—Is That a Reasonable Premium?

  • In the mining and strategic minerals sector, especially when the target controls critical, non-China rare earth assets, premiums of 300–500% are not unheard of—provided the buyer is securing supply security, technological capability, or strategic infrastructure that’s difficult or time-consuming to replicate.

  • That said, for shareholders of Ucore, such an offer (in that 3.8×–5× range) would represent a powerful value realization opportunity—assuming the deal is credible and fully financed.


Summary

If MP Materials were to make an all-cash offer for Ucore, paying up to US$1.05–1.15 billion, that implies a premium of about 450% to over 500% above Ucore’s current market capitalization of ~US$189 million (based on a US$2.02 share price).

In other words: a 3.8×–5× premium—a substantial but arguably justifiable multiple given the strategic value of Ucore’s rare-earth resources and separation facility.


If Ucore Rare Metals were to attract acquisition interest, several entities—ranging from miners to technology firms—could emerge as plausible suitors. Here's a breakdown of the most compelling candidates and why they might be interested:


1. Lynas Rare Earths

Why they might bid:

  • As the world’s largest rare earth producer outside China, Lynas is already expanding its footprint—including building a heavy rare earths processing plant in Texas backed by US defense funding. A move to acquire Ucore would give it established separation tech (RapidSX™) and facilities in Louisiana, accelerating its domestic US capabilities.

  • Plus, post-DoD support for U.S. rare earth independence makes Lynas a logical player to consolidate assets.
    Ucore.com+12Yahoo Finance+12 Reuters+7

2. Energy Fuels

  • This U.S. company is already pivoting from uranium into rare earths. It’s commissioning a rare earth separation circuit at its White Mesa Mill in Utah and gaining monazite feed supplies via a Base Resources deal.

  • An acquisition of Ucore would add advanced separation tech and a strategic Louisiana facility to its vertically integrated vision.
    Crux Investor+1


3. Neo Performance Materials

  • A Canadian company with global operations in rare earth oxides, magnetic powders, and permanent magnets.

  • If Neo aims to bolster its North American processing footprint, Ucore’s RapidSX™ separation platform and Louisiana site could be attractive.
    Reuters+1 Rare Earth Exchanges+15Yahoo Finance+15


4. Solvay, Vacuumschmelze (via Ara Partners), or Other Western REE Processors

  • Solvay (France) is expanding rare earth oxide separation for magnets, aiming for 2025 launch.

  • Vacuumschmelze, backed by U.S. private equity (Ara Partners), is building a NdFeB magnet plant in South Carolina.

  • Both could see strategic value in adding Ucore’s U.S.-based separation tech to their supply chain.
    ReutersCrux Investor+1


5. ABx Group or Other Australian REE Miners

  • Ucore has already signed an MOU with ABx Group for offtake and potential investment in ABx’s Tasmanian ionic-adsorption clay REE project.

  • A deeper partnership or acquisition could be mutually beneficial—ABx gains downstream processing certainty, while Ucore strengthens its feedstock pipeline.
    Yahoo Finance+6Investing News Network (INN)+6Yahoo Finance+6


6. Rare Element Resources

  • A Wyoming-based REE miner developing the Bear Lodge project.

  • A merger scenario would create a vertically integrated player: Rare Element’s mining, Ucore’s separation, and even MP Materials’ magnet capabilities.
    Rare Earth Exchanges+8 Reuters+8


7. Phoenix Tailings and Defense-Aligned Investors

  • Phoenix Tailings, a U.S. REE processing startup, has attracted backing from BMW, Yamaha, and venture investors for its low-emission tech and upcoming U.S. facility.

  • While more of a peer than a suitor, joint ventures, licensing deals, or mutual consolidation for scaling could be on the table.
    Reuters


8. Chinese Entities (e.g., Shenghe Resources)

  • Shenghe is deeply embedded in the global REE market and owns a stake in MP Materials. Although geopolitical sensitivities make outright acquisition unlikely, financial investing or strategic partnerships can’t be fully ruled out.

  • Note: Canada has shown a willingness to block Chinese REE-related deals on national security grounds.
    Wikipedia


Summary Table

Potential SuitorStrategic Rationale
Lynas Rare EarthsRapidly scaling US processing; Louisiana facility synergistic
Energy FuelsBuilding a vertically integrated REE supply chain
Neo Performance MaterialsStrong global presence; would benefit from U.S. separation tech
Solvay / VacuumschmelzeWestern processors seeking U.S.-based capacity
ABx Group (Australia)Strengthen supply/offtake linkage and downstream investment opportunities
Rare Element ResourcesM&A to create a full domestic REE value chain
Phoenix Tailings / VC/Defence alliesPossible tech/joint ventures in low-emission processing
Shenghe ResourcesGeopolitically delicate—but financial or strategic interest remains possible

Final Thoughts

Given Ucore’s unique combination of advanced separation technology, DoD support, and a developing U.S. processing facility, it stands out as a strategic asset in the rare-earth sector’s race to de-risk from Chinese dominance. 

Acquirers with mining, processing, or defense-aligned profiles are most suited to be suitors.

Full Disclosure: We are Long Ucore, MP and AVL

Rare Earth Elements - Ucore Rare Metals Inc. - update!



Tuesday, August 12, 2025

REEs are critical to all cutting edge technologies now and early investors should be rewarded! We just took a small position in our 4th REE stock-CRML

 

 

REE stocks - Critical Metals Corp. (CRML)

Brief overview

CRML is a pre-revenue, high-risk developer with two strategically important assets: 

1. Tanbreez (heavy-rare-earth-rich REE project in Greenland) and 

2. Wolfsberg (fully permitted hard-rock lithium project in Austria). 

The March 12, 2025 S-K 1300 for Tanbreez established a compliant 45 Mt @ ~0.4% TREO with ~27% HREO, and EXIM Bank issued a US$120M loan LOI in June 2025—signals of both resource scale and geopolitical relevance. Balance-sheet strength and execution (DFS, permitting, financing, and offtake) remain the gating items; upside hinges on converting strategic interest into funded, build-ready projects. GlobeNewswireCritical Metals CorpReuters


What CRML legally controls

  • Tanbreez (Greenland, REEs): CRML holds a controlling interest in Tanbreez Mining Greenland A/S and has the contractual right to increase ownership to 92.5% after investing up to US$10M (management indicates completion targeted in 2025). Stock Titan

  • Wolfsberg (Austria, lithium): CRML controls the fully licensed Wolfsberg lithium project (spodumene) in Carinthia, ~270 km south of Vienna. criticalmetalscorp.gcs-web.com


Resources & geology (defensible figures)

  • Tanbreez S-K 1300 (Mar 12 2025): 45 Mt @ ~0.4% TREO; ~27% HREO share (unusually high for hard-rock deposits). Company communications also describe the broader kakortokite host rock ~4.7 Bnt, but the 45 Mt is the current compliant MRE to anchor on. GlobeNewswire

  • Additional technical context: Company May 2025 update reiterates the 0.38–0.40% TREO and ~27% HREO mix and highlights deep drilling upside. Critical Metals Corp

  • Wolfsberg DFS (Mar 8 2023, JORC): Ore Reserves ~11.5 Mt @ 0.64% Li₂O (Proved+Probable). The DFS outlines ~15-year LOM at ~780 kt/a steady-state mining. MinedocsAustralian Securities Exchange


Project status & 2025 milestones

  • Tanbreez

    • EXIM Bank LOI: US$120M 15-year loan to support development (technical/economic studies, pre-production, start-up). Critical Metals Corp Reuters Investing Nasdaq

    • DFS underway: CRML engaged NIRAS A/S (Denmark) to complete the Definitive Feasibility Study. Critical Metals Corp Stock Titan

    • Strategic context: U.S. & Danish officials previously lobbied to keep Tanbreez out of Chinese hands, underscoring U.S. supply-chain priorities. Reuters

    • Economics (company scenario): CRML disclosed an NPV range around US$2.8–3.6B and IRR indications (company estimates; treat as preliminary until DFS). Critical Metals Corp

  • Wolfsberg

    • Project described by CRML as fully licensed hard-rock lithium operation with prior DFS work (European Lithium-era), positioned for EU battery supply chains. European Lithium


Financing & balance sheet (directional)

  • Public trackers show a thin cash position vs. development needs and modest debt—typical for pre-revenue developers; future equity/convertible/offtake prepayments are likely. Please consult the latest quarterly on CRML’s IR site for exact figures and runway. StockAnalysisCritical Metals Corp

  • Key funding signal: the EXIM LOI meaningfully de-risks early-stage capital for Tanbreez but is not a definitive commitment; conditions precedent and U.S. policy priorities apply. Reuters


Ownership, institutions & insider activity (indicative)

  • Institutions: Data sources vary; reported institutional ownership ranges are low-to-mid single digits on some trackers, with filings showing increased positions from certain funds 

  • (e.g., BlackRock 13F showing a ~600% q/q increase to ~1.65 M shares as of 6/30/25). Treat 13F data as backward-looking. ChartMillNasdaqFintel

  • Insiders/Form 4s: Third-party screens show limited recent insider transactions; always verify directly against the SEC filings page or CRML IR for definitive records. NasdaqMarketChameleon.com


Competitive/strategic positioning

  • Why Tanbreez matters: Hard-rock REEs with a high HREO proportion (~27%) are strategically valuable for NdFeB magnet supply chains (EVs, wind, defense). Western HREO projects are scarce; Tanbreez’s scale and deep-water access add appeal. criticalmetalscorp.gcs-web.com

  • Why Wolfsberg matters: A fully permitted EU-located Li project fits Europe’s push for domestic battery materials under critical-raw-materials policies. criticalmetalscorp.gcs-web.com

  • Geopolitics as a tailwind: U.S. interest in Greenland’s REEs is explicit and ongoing; CRML’s asset base aligns with Western supply-chain security goals. Reuters


Near-term catalysts to watch

  1. Tanbreez DFS progress (scope, capex/opex, flowsheet, schedules). Critical Metals Corp

  2. Financing progression (conversion of EXIM LOI; additional project finance; potential EU/Denmark/Greenland support mechanisms). Critical Metals Corp

  3. Resource/Met updates (infill/deep drilling results; potential HREO recovery data). Critical Metals Corp

  4. Offtake discussions (magnet makers, defense/EV supply-chain counterparties)—not announced yet, but pivotal. (No public offtakes disclosed in sources above.)


Key risks

  • Funding risk: Multi-hundred-million-dollar capex across two projects; equity dilution is likely absent major offtake prepayments/exports credit support. StockAnalysis

  • Technical/execution risk: Kakortokite mineralogy and HREO recovery need DFS-level proof at commercial scale. criticalmetalscorp.gcs-web.com

  • Permitting/community & geopolitical complexity: Greenland/EU policy and environmental standards can lengthen timelines; EXIM LOI is conditional. Reuters

  • Commodity-price risk: REE basket pricing (especially Dy/Tb/Nd/Pr) and lithium price volatility materially affect economics.


Is CRML a likely takeover target?

  • Strategic Appeal
    CRML holds two geopolitical-critical assets:

    1. Tanbreez — a rare-earth project in Greenland rich in heavy REEs (critical for Western defense and technology supply chains).

    2. Wolfsberg — a fully permitted lithium project in Austria, positioned to feed Europe’s EV battery market.

    These assets align strongly with Western governments’ supply-chain security strategies, which enhances CRML’s attractiveness to both industrial players and state-backed investors. Cohen & Company Capital Markets+2

  • Growing Confidence Signals
    The appointment of retired U.S. Air Force Four-Star General Timothy Ray to CRML’s advisory board underscores the company’s strategic importance and could raise the profile among potential acquirers, especially in defense circles. Yahoo FinanceStock Titan+1

  • Economic Upside
    A Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for Tanbreez shows:

    These economics hint at enormous latent value, enticing for larger mining or strategic buyers looking to vertically integrate or diversify.


Who might be interested?

  1. Major REE or lithium producers
    Companies like MP Materials, Lynas Rare Earths, or Albemarle may see value in expanding into Greenland or Europe to balance global supply chains.

  2. Battery manufacturers or automakers
    Automakers or battery materials firms (especially in Europe) could pursue CRML assets to secure feedstock. Similar models have precedented off-takes like the earlier BMW MOU seen in European Lithium’s pre-merger phase. Cohen & Company Capital Markets+4Stock Titan+4

  3. Governments or state-sponsored consortia
    European or U.S. defense and infrastructure entities (or even sovereign wealth funds) focused on building critical metals autonomy may pursue equity or asset acquisitions for strategic supply.


Summary

  • Potential?  Yes—CRML’s strategic resource base and improving project metrics make it a plausible acquisition target.

  • Likely suitors? Established mining majors, battery/EV OEMs, or government-backed purchasers aligned with critical supply-chain objectives.

Bottom line (investor lens)


  1. Update: October 9th 2025 - In Sept, we added to...$CRML 

    up 26% "today" on news of another, larger, offtake agreement for the "Tanbreez" project in Iceland from U.S. company, REalloys!
    The agreement underscores the companies' shared commitment to build an independent domestic supply chain that reduces reliance on China

    Critical Metals said 25% of the total production of its Tanbreez project is now allotted for U.S. customers, taking into account the offtake agreement it signed with Ucore Rare Metals in August.