Your retirement/Investment fund can now own these three web addresses/Domains!
Retirefund.com Click!
Retirefunds.com Click!
Retirefund.com Click!
Retirefunds.com Click!
Recently, I decided to sell my position in Micron Technology (MU). This decision was not based on a negative view of the company itself. On the contrary, Micron remains one of the world's most strategically important semiconductor companies and is exceptionally well-positioned to benefit from the Artificial Intelligence revolution.
My decision was based on valuation, risk/reward, and capital allocation considerations rather than any deterioration in the company's business prospects.
In investing, there is an important distinction between a great company and a great stock. While Micron remains a great company, I believe the stock currently reflects a significant amount of future optimism, reducing the margin of safety available to new investors.
Micron sits at the center of one of the most important technological transitions in modern history.
AI systems developed by companies such as Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, Microsoft, xAI, and Amazon require enormous amounts of memory to operate effectively. As AI models become larger and more sophisticated, memory bandwidth has become nearly as important as processing power.
Recent developments further strengthened Micron's strategic position:
These developments confirm that Micron is becoming a critical "picks-and-shovels" supplier to the AI economy.
The primary reason for selling is simple:
The stock price appears to be pricing in near-perfect execution and the trade is crowded.
Micron is no longer being valued as a cyclical semiconductor manufacturer. It is increasingly being valued as a strategic AI infrastructure company.
While that re-rating may be justified, it also creates risk.
Today's valuation assumes:
When a stock requires multiple favorable outcomes to justify its valuation, future returns become more dependent upon expectations remaining elevated.
One lesson from semiconductor history is that memory shortages rarely last forever.
The industry typically follows a familiar pattern:
AI may lengthen this cycle, but it is unlikely to eliminate it.
While the AI era has fundamentally improved Micron's long-term outlook, investors should remember that memory remains one of the most cyclical segments of the semiconductor industry.
Another factor behind my decision was opportunity cost.
At current prices, Micron may continue to perform well.
However, I believe several areas of the AI ecosystem may offer better risk-adjusted upside:
Companies operating in these areas may be earlier in their adoption cycles and less fully appreciated by institutional investors.
As a result, capital may generate greater alpha elsewhere than in a company that has already become one of the market's most popular AI investments.
One of the most overlooked investing principles is knowing when to protect gains.
Selling a successful investment does not mean the thesis was wrong.
It often means the thesis has largely played out.
The objective is not to own every winner forever.
The objective is to allocate capital where future returns appear most attractive relative to risk.
At today's valuation, I believe Micron offers:
That combination makes it a less compelling opportunity than it was when purchased.
I would happily reconsider Micron under several scenarios:
A market correction or AI spending scare could create a more attractive entry point.
If earnings continue to expand rapidly while the stock consolidates, valuation could become more reasonable over time.
Further evidence that AI has permanently altered the memory industry's economics would strengthen the long-term investment case.
Selling Micron should not be interpreted as a bearish call on Artificial Intelligence, AI infrastructure, or memory demand.
Rather, it reflects a belief that:
Micron has evolved from an underappreciated AI beneficiary into a widely recognized AI leader.
The company may continue to thrive.
The stock may even continue higher.
However, successful investing requires looking forward rather than backward.
At current prices, I believe Micron represents a world-class business with increasingly limited upside relative to its growing expectations and valuation.
For that reason, I chose to realize gains and redeploy capital into opportunities where I believe the probability of achieving superior future returns is greater.
As a mentor once told me,
"Look after the pennies and the dollars will look after themselves"!
Investment Conclusion:
However:
I would wait for a meaningful pullback rather than buy immediately after such a strong earnings-driven move.
What qualifies as meaningful?
If that never happens, I'd rather miss a small portion of the move than buy after a sharp post-earnings rally.
The attraction - positioning Bombardier for the next phase of aerospace and defense.
Bombardier Defense has built a growing business converting Global aircraft into ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), maritime patrol, and special-mission platforms. Hundreds of Bombardier aircraft are already used in defense-related missions.
The defense market is rapidly shifting toward a combination of:
Recent U.S. and European defense programs show autonomous drones becoming a core element of future military operations.
Volatus gives Bombardier an immediate entry into:
rather than having to build these capabilities internally.
One of the most compelling industrial combinations would be:
| Bombardier | Volatus |
|---|---|
| Global 6500 ISR aircraft | Tactical ISR drones |
| Long-range surveillance | Short-range surveillance |
| Manned platforms | Unmanned platforms |
| Military mission aircraft | Drone operators and training |
| Defense customers | Defense drone customers |
Together they could offer a complete surveillance stack.
For example:
This is exactly where NATO procurement appears to be heading.
Canada recently announced significant investments in aerospace defense technologies, autonomous systems, and a new drone innovation hub.
Bombardier aircraft and drone technologies are both being highlighted as important domestic capabilities.
A Bombardier-Volatus combination would create:
which aligns well with Ottawa's "build Canadian" defense objectives.
Many companies build drones.
Far fewer possess:
Volatus has been steadily accumulating these capabilities.
For Bombardier, acquiring that expertise could be faster than spending years developing it.
Volatus has been winning NATO-related ISR and training contracts while expanding into allied markets.
Bombardier is simultaneously growing its defense business, which recently surpassed US$1 billion in annual revenue ahead of schedule.
The strategic logic is straightforward:
That generally commands higher margins and larger contracts.
There are also important counter arguments.
If you asked me to estimate the probability today:
The most logical path may actually be:
From a shareholder perspective, the strongest acquisition case is not that Volatus is a drone company.
It is that Volatus is becoming a Canadian defense-autonomy platform at precisely the same time Bombardier is transforming itself into a defense aerospace company.
Ed Note: Last week,
Volatus Aerospace Opened it's brand new, 53,000-Square-Foot Mirabel Facility,
Establishing Domestic Manufacturing Base for Autonomous Defence Systems
Discl: Long and accumulating FLT shares
Those two trends are converging quickly.
Since the early-May highs, both precious metals and mining equities have experienced a significant correction.
Silver has retreated sharply from its peak.
Gold has pulled back from record levels.
Silver miners and gold miners have fallen even more than the underlying metals.
To many investors, this appears bearish.
For long-term investors, (including us) it represents:
A rare opportunity to accumulate strategic assets while the long-term thesis remains intact.
The critical observation is this:
The prices have corrected. The fundamentals largely have not.
In fact, many of the drivers supporting both gold and silver today appear stronger than they were a year ago:
The result is a compelling setup for investors willing to look beyond the next quarter.
Historically investors separated precious metals into two camps:
Today that distinction is increasingly blurred.
Both metals are becoming strategic assets.
Gold is regaining importance as:
Silver is becoming increasingly critical to:
Together, gold and silver now form what may be the world's most important
hard-asset combination.
Gold's investment case has strengthened significantly over the last several years.
Central banks continue to accumulate gold despite record prices.
The World Gold Council reported estimated central-bank purchases of 244 tonnes during Q1 2026, exceeding both the previous quarter and the five-year average.
A recent survey found that a record 45% of central banks expect to increase their gold holdings over the next year.
This matters because central banks represent:
They are not trading.
They are allocating reserves.
Their continued purchases suggest that gold's strategic importance is increasing rather than declining.
Silver may be even more interesting.
Unlike gold, silver has two major demand drivers.
Silver possesses the highest electrical conductivity of any metal.
As AI and electrification expand globally, silver demand continues to benefit from secular growth trends.
This is arguably the strongest part of the silver thesis.
According to the Silver Institute and World Silver Survey 2026, the market is expected to record its sixth consecutive annual deficit.
Above-ground inventories continue to be drawn down to satisfy demand.
This is important because:
It is produced as a by-product of:
Therefore:
This structural issue remains one of the strongest long-term bullish arguments for silver.
The correction since May appears driven largely by:
These are cyclical factors.
The long-term drivers are structural.
Historically, some of the best precious-metals investments have been made when:
while
That may be the situation today.
PSLV represents direct ownership of physical silver.
No mining risk.
No cost overruns.
No political issues.
Simply exposure to a strategic metal experiencing persistent deficits.
If silver ultimately benefits from:
PSLV may become the purest way to participate.
AG is one of the most recognized silver miners globally.
When silver prices rise, profitability can expand dramatically.
This operational leverage often causes silver miners to outperform the metal itself during bull markets.
If silver enters a true scarcity-driven bull market:
AG may become one of the largest beneficiaries.
EDR adds something AG does not:
Its Terronera project provides company-specific growth potential in addition to silver exposure.
This creates two possible drivers:
Few silver miners offer both growth and leverage simultaneously.
This is where gold enters the story.
XGD owns many of the world's major gold producers.
These companies benefit from:
Unlike silver miners, gold producers generally provide:
Gold remains the world's preferred hard-money asset.
The current correction may be providing investors an opportunity to buy world-class gold producers at more attractive valuations than were available earlier in the year.
Many investors choose one or the other.
Historically, the strongest precious-metals portfolios often own both.
Gold and silver provide different exposures:
| Asset | Primary Driver |
|---|---|
| Gold | Monetary demand |
| Silver | Industrial + monetary demand |
| Gold Miners | Gold price leverage |
| Silver Miners | Silver price leverage |
Together they create diversification within the precious-metals sector itself.
For an investor focused on:
I would currently favor:
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| PSLV | 25% |
| AG | 25% |
| EDR | 20% |
| XGD | 30% |
In the earlier report, the emphasis was heavily silver-focused.
Today I believe gold deserves a larger allocation because:
Meanwhile silver retains its higher upside potential.
This creates a more balanced precious-metals strategy.
If the following continue:
Then both gold and silver may remain in secular bull markets.
Several major institutions continue to forecast substantially higher gold prices over the next several years, supported by central-bank buying and reserve diversification.
Meanwhile the silver market continues to face structural shortages and inventory drawdowns.
The correction since May has likely scared out short-term traders.
But for long-term investors, it may have created something more valuable:
A chance to accumulate both monetary metals and strategic technology metals at lower prices.
Gold is increasingly becoming the world's preferred reserve asset.
Silver is increasingly becoming the world's preferred electrification asset.
And the combination of:
creates a portfolio that is positioned to benefit from both of the defining themes of the next decade:
and